scholarly journals Evaluation of Functional Outcomes of Intra-articular Fractures of Distal Humerus by Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

Author(s):  
Gokul Chand Verma ◽  
Sarita Jilowa ◽  
Jitendra Singh ◽  
Dinesh Rathi
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen chen ◽  
Dan Xiao ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
Maoqi Gong ◽  
Yejun Zha ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To evaluate the difference of functional outcomes between OTA/AO type C, Gustilo type I/II open fractures and closed fractures of the distal humerus after open reduction and internal fixation.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with OTA/AO-C distal humerus fractures who were treated in our department from January 2014 to December 2016. The patients were divided into an open fracture group and a closed fracture group. Their baseline characteristics and functional outcomes were analyzed and comparedResults: A total of 64 patients treated by operative fixation were identified (25 open and 39 closed injuries), and the average follow-up time was 35.1±13.6 months. There were no significant differences in the hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, medical costs, range of motion (ROM) of the elbow, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, or complications between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion: OTA/AO type C, Gustilo I/II distal humeral open fractures can yield satisfactory clinical results similar to those of closed distal humeral fractures after open reduction and internal fixation.Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Chen ◽  
Dan Xiao ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
Maoqi Gong ◽  
Yejun Zha ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To evaluate the difference of functional outcomes between OTA/AO type C, Gustilo type I/II open fractures and closed fractures of the distal humerus after open reduction and internal fixation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with OTA/AO-C distal humerus fractures who were treated in our department from January 2014 to December 2016. The patients were divided into an open fracture group and a closed fracture group. Their baseline characteristics and functional outcomes were analyzed and compared. Results A total of 64 patients treated by operative fixation were identified (25 open and 39 closed injuries), and the average follow-up time was 35.1 ± 13.6 months. There were no significant differences in the range of motion (ROM) of the elbow, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, complications, hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, or medical costs between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion OTA/AO type C, Gustilo I/II distal humeral open fractures can yield satisfactory clinical results similar to those of closed distal humeral fractures after open reduction and internal fixation. Level of evidence Therapeutic Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (37) ◽  
pp. 3316-3322
Author(s):  
Subhadeep Ghosh ◽  
Sunit Hazra

BACKGROUND Intercondylar humerus fractures and low transcondylar type fractures of distal humeral often require surgical exposure and anatomical reduction of the articular surface as well as stabilization of the medial and lateral columns of the distal humerus. Traditionally, these injuries have been treated surgically with various extensor mechanism-disrupting surgical approaches. These approaches have often led to delayed union or non-union of the olecranon, triceps weakness, and osteotomy-related prominent implants. To avoid these problems, various extensor mechanism-sparing approaches that provide bicolumnar exposure of the distal part of the humerus have been described, including triceps-splitting and reflecting techniques. The paratricipital approach was developed to avoid the problems of olecranon osteotomy approach for non comminuted distal humerus fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the paratricipital approach with olecranon osteotomy and evaluate their effects on the functional outcomes of intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) by reviewing 38 cases of intercondylar distal humerus fractures surgically managed with either of the approaches during 2015 - 2017. METHODS The retrospective study was conducted at our institution, R.G. Kar Medical College, Kolkata from May 2015 to May 2017. OA type C1 and C2 fractures were included in the study. Type C3 fractures were excluded from the study. Distal humeral open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was performed with either orthogonal or parallel plate constructs in 38 patients, where paratricipital approach was used in 21 patients and olecranon osteotomy was done for 17 patients. RESULTS Patients in the paratricipital approach group seems to have better range of motion in terms of flexion and extension. Moreover, mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) of the paratricipital group is better than that of olecranon osteotomy group, even more so in younger age groups. CONCLUSIONS We found that ORIF via the paratricipital approach would confer better functional outcomes for simple intra-articular distal humerus fractures in patients of all age groups. KEYWORDS Distal Humerus Fracture, Paratricipital, Olecranon Osteotomy


Author(s):  
Yaiza Lopiz ◽  
Daniel Garríguez-Pérez ◽  
Carlos García-Fernández ◽  
Laura del Baño ◽  
María Galán-Olleros ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document