ant gardens
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

30
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Jonas Morales‐Linares ◽  
Alejandro Flores‐Palacios ◽  
Angélica María Corona‐López ◽  
Víctor Hugo Toledo‐Hernández

Author(s):  
Jonas Morales‐Linares ◽  
Alejandro Flores‐Palacios ◽  
Angélica María Corona‐López ◽  
Víctor Hugo Toledo‐Hernández
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Jonas Morales-Linares ◽  
Angélica María Corona-López ◽  
Víctor Hugo Toledo-Hernández ◽  
Alejandro Flores-Palacios
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 35-38
Author(s):  
Bruno Corbara
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Bruno Corbara
Keyword(s):  

Plant Biology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 525-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Morales-Linares ◽  
J. G. García-Franco ◽  
A. Flores-Palacios ◽  
J. E. Valenzuela-González ◽  
M. Mata-Rosas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sociobiology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Eduardo Vicente ◽  
Thiago Junqueira Izzo

Ant-garden ants have a strong relationship with epiphytes that need light to grow, for these reason, it has been previously documented in forest gaps. Moreover, larger gaps have more available area for nesting and habitats for use as forage. Thus we hypothesize that 1) canopy openness influence the presence of ant´s gardens in gaps, and 2) greater gaps will have more nests, and 3) both openness canopy and area determine the colony size in forest gaps. Furthermore, it is known that parabiotic ants foraging on the ground and in vegetation, the nests are arboreal. So, we also hypothesize that 4) parabiotic ants are more often sampled in arboreal strata and 5) increasing vegetation connectivity and the volume of accumulated litter in the soil increase the foraging of the ants in vegetation and ground, respectively, with the increase in canopy openness increasing the activity of the two species in both strata. Presence, number of Ant-gardens, as colony size, was affected by area and locality, but not by canopy openness. Nevertheless, there was not overall difference in the use of strata by Camponotus femoratus, neither by Crematogaster levior. On the other hand, frequency of C. femoratus on the ground decreases with canopy openness but is not affected by the vegetation connectivity.  Also, C. levior frequency on the ground also decreases with the increase of complexity of vegetation and canopy openness. In addition, neither vegetation connectivity, or canopy openness influence the frequency of foraging of these ants in understory.


Sociobiology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Carolina Leal ◽  
Catarina C Jacovak ◽  
Paulo Estefano D Bobrowiec ◽  
José Luiz C Camargo ◽  
Paulo Enrique C Peixoto

Ant gardens (AGs) are a multi-partner specialized ant-plant interaction involving several ant and epiphyte species. Although studies on AGs have reported possible roles for some species in this system, there are unanswered questions regarding the process of epiphyte incorporation in the AGs and the role of less aggressive ant species in AG protection. In this study, we used AGs in the Brazilian Amazon forest formed by two parabiotic ant species to test a set of hypothesis regarding two main questions: 1) How is AG plant community composition affected by the surrounding environment? 2) Does Crematogaster levior play a role in the chemical detection of herbivory in the AGs? After identifying epiphytes occurring at AGs at the forest edge and in the interior, we found that ant gardens in each environment exhibited different compositions, and that plant species bearing oil or extrafloral nectar glands were more frequent in AGs located in the forest interior than in those at the forest edge. By performing experiments with volatile compounds emitted from injured epiphytes, we detected that only Camponotus femoratus was responsive, responding almost eight times faster in response to plant extracts than water treatments. Our results support the idea that environmental conditions affect ant preference for feeding resources provided by epiphytes and consequently shape the structure of the epiphyte community in AGs. On the other hand, the role of C. levior in AGs remains unknown, since it seems to play no direct or indirect role in AG protection.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1036-1046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Morales-Linares ◽  
José G. García-Franco ◽  
Alejandro Flores-Palacios ◽  
Jorge E. Valenzuela-González ◽  
Martín Mata-Rosas ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 284 (1850) ◽  
pp. 20161759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Chomicki ◽  
Milan Janda ◽  
Susanne S. Renner

Ant-gardens (AGs) are ant/plant mutualisms in which ants farm epiphytes in return for nest space and food rewards. They occur in the Neotropics and Australasia, but not in Africa, and their evolutionary assembly remains unclear. We here use phylogenetic frameworks for important AG lineages in Australasia, namely the ant genus Philidris and domatium-bearing ferns ( Lecanopteris ) and flowering plants in the Apocynaceae ( Hoya and Dischidia ) and Rubiaceae ( Myrmecodia , Hydnophytum , Anthorrhiza , Myrmephytum and Squamellaria ). Our analyses revealed that in these clades, diaspore dispersal by ants evolved at least 13 times, five times in the Late Miocene and Pliocene in Australasia and seven times during the Pliocene in Southeast Asia, after Philidris ants had arrived there, with subsequent dispersal between these two areas. A uniquely specialized AG system evolved in Fiji at the onset of the Quaternary. The farming in the same AG of epiphytes that do not offer nest spaces suggests that a broadening of the ants' plant host spectrum drove the evolution of additional domatium-bearing AG-epiphytes by selecting on pre-adapted morphological traits. Consistent with this, we found a statistical correlation between the evolution of diaspore dispersal by ants and domatia in all three lineages. Our study highlights how host broadening by a symbiont has led to new farming mutualisms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document