Asymptotic Properties of Stationary Solutions of Coupled Nonconvex Nonsmooth Empirical Risk Minimization

This paper has two main goals: (a) establish several statistical properties—consistency, asymptotic distributions, and convergence rates—of stationary solutions and values of a class of coupled nonconvex and nonsmooth empirical risk-minimization problems and (b) validate these properties by a noisy amplitude-based phase-retrieval problem, the latter being of much topical interest. Derived from available data via sampling, these empirical risk-minimization problems are the computational workhorse of a population risk model that involves the minimization of an expected value of a random functional. When these minimization problems are nonconvex, the computation of their globally optimal solutions is elusive. Together with the fact that the expectation operator cannot be evaluated for general probability distributions, it becomes necessary to justify whether the stationary solutions of the empirical problems are practical approximations of the stationary solution of the population problem. When these two features, general distribution and nonconvexity, are coupled with nondifferentiability that often renders the problems “non-Clarke regular,” the task of the justification becomes challenging. Our work aims to address such a challenge within an algorithm-free setting. The resulting analysis is, therefore, different from much of the analysis in the recent literature that is based on local search algorithms. Furthermore, supplementing the classical global minimizer-centric analysis, our results offer a promising step to close the gap between computational optimization and asymptotic analysis of coupled, nonconvex, nonsmooth statistical estimation problems, expanding the former with statistical properties of the practically obtained solution and providing the latter with a more practical focus pertaining to computational tractability.

Semisupervised Ordinal Regression Based on Empirical Risk Minimization

Ordinal regression is aimed at predicting an ordinal class label. In this letter, we consider its semisupervised formulation, in which we have unlabeled data along with ordinal-labeled data to train an ordinal regressor. There are several metrics to evaluate the performance of ordinal regression, such as the mean absolute error, mean zero-one error, and mean squared error. However, the existing studies do not take the evaluation metric into account, restrict model choice, and have no theoretical guarantee. To overcome these problems, we propose a novel generic framework for semisupervised ordinal regression based on the empirical risk minimization principle that is applicable to optimizing all of the metrics mentioned above. In addition, our framework has flexible choices of models, surrogate losses, and optimization algorithms without the common geometric assumption on unlabeled data such as the cluster assumption or manifold assumption. We provide an estimation error bound to show that our risk estimator is consistent. Finally, we conduct experiments to show the usefulness of our framework.

Loss Functions, Axioms, and Peer Review

It is common to see a handful of reviewers reject a highly novel paper, because they view, say, extensive experiments as far more important than novelty, whereas the community as a whole would have embraced the paper. More generally, the disparate mapping of criteria scores to final recommendations by different reviewers is a major source of inconsistency in peer review. In this paper we present a framework inspired by empirical risk minimization (ERM) for learning the community's aggregate mapping. The key challenge that arises is the specification of a loss function for ERM. We consider the class of L(p,q) loss functions, which is a matrix-extension of the standard class of Lp losses on vectors; here the choice of the loss function amounts to choosing the hyperparameters p and q. To deal with the absence of ground truth in our problem, we instead draw on computational social choice to identify desirable values of the hyperparameters p and q. Specifically, we characterize p=q=1 as the only choice of these hyperparameters that satisfies three natural axiomatic properties. Finally, we implement and apply our approach to reviews from IJCAI 2017.

Classification from Pairwise Similarities/Dissimilarities and Unlabeled Data via Empirical Risk Minimization

Pairwise similarities and dissimilarities between data points are often obtained more easily than full labels of data in real-world classification problems. To make use of such pairwise information, an empirical risk minimization approach has been proposed, where an unbiased estimator of the classification risk is computed from only pairwise similarities and unlabeled data. However, this approach has not yet been able to handle pairwise dissimilarities. Semisupervised clustering methods can incorporate both similarities and dissimilarities into their framework; however, they typically require strong geometrical assumptions on the data distribution such as the manifold assumption, which may cause severe performance deterioration. In this letter, we derive an unbiased estimator of the classification risk based on all of similarities and dissimilarities and unlabeled data. We theoretically establish an estimation error bound and experimentally demonstrate the practical usefulness of our empirical risk minimization method.