model transformation language
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

30
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Aziz Srai ◽  
Fatima Guerouate ◽  
Hilal Drissi Lahsini

Today with the growth of the internet, the use of social networks, mobile telephony, connected and communicating objects. The data has become so big, hence the need to exploit that data has become primordial. In practice, a very large number of companies specializing in the health sector, the banking and financial sector, insurance, manufacturing industry, etc… are based on traditional databases which are often well organized of customer data, machine data, etc ... but in most cases, very large volumes of data from these databases, and the speed with which they must be analyzed to meet the business needs of the company are real challenges.This article aims to respond to a problem of generating NoSQL MongoDB databases by applying an approach based on model-driven engineering (Model Driven Architecture Approach). We provide Model to Model (using the QVT model transformation language), and Model to Code transformations (using the code generator, Acceleo). We also propose vertical and horizontal transformations to demonstrate the validity of our approach on NoSQL MongoDB databases. We have studied in this article the PSM transformations towards the implementation. PIM to PSM transformations are the subject of another work.


Author(s):  
K. Lano ◽  
S. Kolahdouz-Rahimi

Abstract The QVT-Relations (QVT-R) model transformation language is an OMG standard notation for model transformation specification. It is highly declarative and supports (in principle) bidirectional (bx) transformation specification. However, there are many unclear or unsatisfactory aspects to its semantics, which is not precisely defined in the standard. UML-RSDS is an executable subset of UML and OCL. It has a precise mathematical semantics and criteria for ensuring correctness of applications (including model transformations) by construction. There is extensive tool support for verification and for production of 3GL code in multiple languages (Java, C#, C++, C, Swift and Python). In this paper, we define a translation from QVT-R into UML-RSDS, which provides a logically oriented semantics for QVT-R, aligned with the RelToCore mapping semantics in the QVT standard. The translation includes variation points to enable specialised semantics to be selected in particular transformation cases. The translation provides a basis for verification and static analysis of QVT-R specifications and also enables the production of efficient code implementations of QVT-R specifications. We evaluate the approach by applying it to solve benchmark examples of bx.


Author(s):  
Abdelali Elmounadi ◽  
Naoual Berbiche ◽  
Nacer Sefiani ◽  
Nawfal El Moukhi

In this paper, we present a hybrid-based model transformation, according to the Architecture Driven Modernization (ADM) approach, intended for getting UML (Unified Modeling Language) models from the PHP (Hypertext Preprocessor) code. This latter has been done by offering a tool support for automated generation of UML platform independent models from PHP ASTM (Abstract Syntax Tree Metamodel) representations, which are specific platform models. The model transformation rules are expressed in ATL (Atlas Transformation Language), which is a widely used model transformation language based on the hybrid approach. This work aims to fill the gap between the web-based applications maintenance, especially PHP-based implementations, and the model transformation processes in the ADM context.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-57
Author(s):  
Nesrine Lahiani ◽  
Djamal Bennouar

Abstract Product Derivation represents one of the main challenges that Software Product Line (SPL) faces. Deriving individual products from shared software assets is a time-consuming and an expensive activity. In this paper, we (1) present an MDE approach for engineering SPL and (2) propose to leverage model-to-model transformations (MMT) and model-to-text (MTT) transformations for supporting both domain engineering and application engineering processes. In this work, we use ATL as a model-to-model transformation language and Acceleo as a model-to-text transformation language.The proposed approach is discussed with e-Health product line applications.


Author(s):  
Sandra Greiner ◽  
Thomas Buchmann

Model transformations constitute the key technology for model-driven software development, a software engineering discipline which became more and more important during the last decade. While tool support for unidirectional batch transformations is rather mature, bidirectional and incremental transformations are only weakly investigated. Nevertheless, several usage scenarios demand for incremental and bidirectional transformations, like round-trip engineering between UML class models and Java source code. This paper presents a bidirectional transformation between UML class models and a Java model which is obtained from Java source code. The transformation is written in QVT Relations, a declarative model transformation language provided by the OMG. While the case study demonstrates that it is possible to specify bidirectional transformations between heterogeneous metamodels in a single relational specification, it also reveals some inherent limitations of the language and the corresponding tool support.


2016 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 332-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús M. Almendros-Jiménez ◽  
Luis Iribarne ◽  
Jesús López-Fernández ◽  
Ángel Mora-Segura

Author(s):  
Lamine Lafi ◽  
Jamel Feki ◽  
Slimane Hammoudi

During the last decade, Model Driven Engineering (MDE) has been proposed for supporting the development, maintenance and evolution of software systems. Model Driven Architecture (MDA), Software Factories and Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) are among the most representatives MDE approaches. Nowadays, it is well recognized that model transformation is at the heart of MDE approaches and, consequently represents one of the most important operations in MDE. However, despite the multitude of model transformation language proposals emerging from academic world and industry, these transformations are often manually specified; which is a tedious and error-prone task, and therefore an expensive process. Matching operation between metamodels is the keystone toward a (semi-)automatic transformation process. In this paper, the authors review metamodel matching techniques of the literature and then analyze their pros and cons in order to show how they can be useful for a semi-automatic transformation process. The result is a comparison of metamodel matching techniques, highlighting their similarities and differences in terms of information used for matching, demonstrating significant similarities between these techniques. Next, the authors compare four well-known metamodel matching techniques namely Similarity flooding, SAMT4MDE+ (extended Semi-Automatic Matching Tool for Model Driven Engineering), ModelCVS and AML (AtlanMod Matching Language) on ten couples of metamodels. For this comparison, the authors define a set of six criteria inspired from the database schema matching. One among these criteria is relevant to the quality of matching and for which we define a quality measure metrics. Furthermore, the authors develop a plug-in under Eclipse to support our comparison using ten couples of metamodels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document