instructional sequences
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

22
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
pp. 004005992199459
Author(s):  
Emily C. Bouck ◽  
Rubia D. Anderson ◽  
Holly Long ◽  
Jessica Sprick

Manipulative-based instructional sequences—including both concrete and virtual manipulative instructional sequences—are evidence-based or research-based mathematical interventions for students with disabilities. However, as options for manipulative-based instructional sequences increase, educators need support in deciding the best approach. In this manuscript, we provide practical tips for educators to make decisions about selecting and implementing manipulative-based instructional sequences for students with disabilities. We present and discuss the following steps educators should take when preparing to use a manipulative-based instructional sequence: (a) determine resources, (b) know the student, (c) identify the targeted mathematics, (d) evaluate time constraints, and (c) decide upon the ultimate goal of learning.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sok Ying Liaw ◽  
Khoon Kiat Tan ◽  
Ling Ting Wu ◽  
Seng Chee Tan ◽  
Hyekyung Choo ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND With the availability and capabilities of varied technologically enhanced learning activities, the blended learning approach has become increasingly popular in interprofessional education. The combined use of different technologically enhanced learning activities has not been fully examined, particularly to determine the effects of instructional sequences for effective learning outcomes. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to investigate whether the instructional sequences of a blended learning approach can improve students’ learning outcomes on interprofessional competencies. METHODS A randomized controlled study was conducted with 40 interprofessional health care teams. These teams undertook three technologically enhanced learning activities—Web-based instruction (WI), virtual reality (VR), and simulation exercise (SE)—after random assignment to three groups based on three different instructional sequences (WI-VR-SE, WI-SE-VR, and SE-WI-VR). Pretests and posttests were conducted to evaluate the students’ learning outcomes on interprofessional competencies. RESULTS A total of 198 participants from the three groups completed the questionnaires. All three groups reported significant improvement in their levels of self-efficacy (P<.05) and attitudes (P<.001) toward interprofessional team care about 1 month after the interprofessional learning activity. Although no significant difference was found (P=.06) between the WI-VR-SE and WI-SE-VR groups in the self-efficacy posttests, participants in the SE-WI-VR group reported significantly lower (P<.05) posttest scores than those in the WI-SE-VR group. The majority of the participants (137/198, 69.1%) selected the instructional sequence “WI-VR-SE” as their top preference. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that the instructional sequence of a blended learning approach can have a significant impact on students’ learning outcomes. The learning of concepts from WI followed by problem-solving activity in the SE was found to be a more effective learning sequence than the reverse sequence. We recommend that future studies focus on scaffolding students’ learning when planning instructional sequences for technologically enhanced learning activities within blended learning environments.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 1115-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravit Golan Duncan ◽  
Jinnie Choi ◽  
Moraima Castro-Faix ◽  
Veronica L. Cavera

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 775-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shimin Bao ◽  
Kristin T. Sweatt ◽  
Sarah A. Lechago ◽  
Sarah Antal

ZDM ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1027-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Cobb ◽  
Kara Jackson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document