sagebrush obligate
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

6
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Anthony ◽  
Lee J. Foster ◽  
Christian A. Hagen ◽  
Katie M. Dugger

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan W. Byer ◽  
Thomas E. Dilts ◽  
Eveline S. Larrucea ◽  
Miranda M. Crowell ◽  
Kevin T. Shoemaker ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sarah M Rockwell ◽  
Brian Wehausen ◽  
Pam R Johnson ◽  
Andrea Kristoff ◽  
Jaime L Stephens ◽  
...  

Sagebrush communities, covering millions of hectares in the western United States, are among our most imperiled ecosystems. They are challenged by various anthropogenic stressors, including invasion by non-native grasses, which degrade habitat quality and alter ecosystem function. Sagebrush restoration efforts are being undertaken to improve habitat conditions to benefit a wide range of sagebrush-dependent species. Because birds are good indicators of habitat quality, monitoring avian metrics is an effective way to measure progress of sagebrush restoration. We compared avian community composition and individual species abundance among three sagebrush-steppe habitat types with varying degrees of invasion by non-native crested wheatgrass Agropyron cristatum at the Camas National Wildlife Refuge in eastern Idaho. Sagebrush-obligate birds, such as sage thrasher Oreoscoptes montanus and sagebrush sparrow Artemisiospiza nevadensis, were most abundant in sagebrush habitats with an understory of native grass. Community composition was similar between sagebrush habitats with native and non-native grasses, but quite different from bird communities occupying crested wheatgrass. HABPOPS, a conservation planning tool, predicts that restoration of crested wheatgrass sites to sagebrush in poor or fair condition will increase the density of sagebrush-obligate bird species. Taken together, these results suggest that restoration of crested wheatgrass near-monocultures back to sagebrush will improve habitat value for much of the bird community whether or not the understory can be converted to primarily native grasses, or a mix of natives and non-natives. Of the sagebrush bird species of concern, Brewer’s sparrow Spizella breweri occupied sagebrush habitats with native vs. non-native understory at similar abundances, and this species could serve as a metric of intermediate restoration success. However, sagebrush sparrow and sage thrasher, which were significant indicators of sagebrush with native grasses, will likely benefit most from full restoration of a native herbaceous understory. Grassland-obligate birds like horned lark Eremophila alpestris and grasshopper sparrow Ammodramus savannarum were most abundant at crested wheatgrass-dominated sites and may not benefit from restoration back to shrubland; managers should understand potential trade-offs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Bates ◽  
Chad S. Boyd ◽  
Kirk W. Davies

We assessed plant community succession following prescribed fire on ungrazed Wyoming big sagebrush steppe, eastern Oregon. Treatments were burned (Burn; September and October, 2002) and unburned (Control) sagebrush steppe. Herbaceous yield, vegetation canopy cover and density were compared between treatments after fire (2003–18). Herbaceous yield in the Burn treatment was about double the Control for most of the study period. Prior to fire, native perennials comprised 90–95% of herbaceous yield. After fire, native perennials represented 78% (range 67–93%) and exotic annuals 22% (range 7–33%) of total yield. Exotic annuals increased after fire and responded in two stages. In the first 8 years after fire, desert alyssum dominated the annual plant composition. In the last half of the study, cheatgrass co-dominated the annual component with alyssum. Sagebrush recovery was slow and we estimated sagebrush cover would return to pre-burn levels, at the earliest, in 115 years. Burning Wyoming big sagebrush steppe would be detrimental to sagebrush-obligate wildlife for an extended time period, because of lost cover and structure provided by sagebrush. The additional forage provided on burned areas may give livestock manager’s greater flexibility to rest or defer unburned habitat for wildlife species of critical concern.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. K. Dumroese ◽  
T. Luna ◽  
B. A. Richardson ◽  
F. F. Kilkenny ◽  
J. B. Runyon

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1175-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Mutter ◽  
David C. Pavlacky ◽  
Nicholas J. Van Lanen ◽  
Richard Grenyer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document