tuber cinereum
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

96
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

19
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Giacomozzi ◽  
Lisa Nicolì ◽  
Carlo Sozzi ◽  
Enrico Piovan ◽  
Mohamad Maghnie

IntroductionMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the best approach to investigate the hypothalamic-pituitary region in children with central precocious puberty (CPP). Routine scanning is controversial in girls aged 6-8 year, due to the overwhelming prevalence of idiopathic forms and unrelated incidentalomas. Cerebral lipomas are rare and accidental findings, not usually expected in CPP. We report a girl with CPP and an unusually shaped posterior pituitary gland on SE-T1w sequences.Case DescriptionA 7.3-year-old female was referred for breast development started at age 7. Her past medical history and physical examination were unremarkable, apart from the Tanner stage 2 breast. X-ray of the left-hand revealed a bone age 2-years ahead of her chronological age, projecting her adult height prognosis below the mid parental height. LHRH test and pelvic ultrasound were suggestive for CPP. Routine brain MRI sequences, SE T1w and TSE T2w, showed the posterior pituitary bright spot increased in size and stretched upward. The finding was considered as an anatomical variant, in an otherwise normal brain imaging. Patient was started on treatment with GnRH analogue. At a thorough revaluation, imaging overlap with adipose tissue was suspected and a new MRI scan with 3D-fat-suppression T1w-VIBE sequences demonstrated a lipoma of the tuber cinereum, bordering a perfectly normal neurohypophysis. 3D-T2w-SPACE sequences, acquired at first MRI scan, would have provided a more correct interpretation if rightly considered.ConclusionThis is the first evidence, to our knowledge, of a cerebral lipoma mimicking pituitary gland abnormalities. Our experience highlights the importance of considering suprasellar lipomas in the MRI investigation of children with CPP, despite their rarity, should the T1w sequences show an unexpected pituitary shape. 3D-T2w SPACE sequences could be integrated into standard ones, especially when performing MRI routinely, to avoid potential misinterpretations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 162 (10) ◽  
pp. 2397-2401
Author(s):  
Natsuhi Sasaki ◽  
Shoichi Tani ◽  
Yusuke Funakoshi ◽  
Hirotoshi Imamura ◽  
Ryu Fukumitsu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-46
Author(s):  
Robin George Manappallil ◽  
Pradeep Kumar VG ◽  
Chinganthara Cleetus Suresh

No abstractAsian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.9(2) 2018 45-46


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 261-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumine Tanaka ◽  
Ryota Kogue ◽  
Masayuki Maeda ◽  
Maki Umino ◽  
Yasuo Nakai ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 149 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S3-S3
Author(s):  
Alexandra Budhai ◽  
George Kleinman ◽  
Christian Salib

2017 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Luiz Vitorino Araujo ◽  
José C. E. Veiga ◽  
Hung Tzu Wen ◽  
Almir F. de Andrade ◽  
Manoel J. Teixeira ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEAccess to the third ventricle is a veritable challenge to neurosurgeons. In this context, anatomical and morphometric studies are useful for establishing the limitations and advantages of a particular surgical approach. The transchoroidal approach is versatile and provides adequate exposure of the middle and posterior regions of the third ventricle. However, the fornix column limits the exposure of the anterior region of the third ventricle. There is evidence that the unilateral section of the fornix column has little effect on cognitive function. This study compared the anatomical exposure afforded by the transforniceal-transchoroidal approach with that of the transchoroidal approach. In addition, a morphometric evaluation of structures that are relevant to and common in the 2 approaches was performed.METHODSThe anatomical exposure provided by the transcallosal-transchoroidal and transcallosal-transforniceal-transchoroidal approaches was compared in 8 fresh cadavers, using a neuronavigation system. The working area, microsurgical exposure area, and angular exposure on the longitudinal and transversal planes of 2 anatomical targets (tuber cinereum and cerebral aqueduct) were compared. Additionally, the thickness of the right frontal lobe parenchyma, thickness of the corpus callosum trunk, and longitudinal diameter of the interventricular foramen were measured. The values obtained were submitted to statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon test.RESULTSIn the quantitative evaluation, compared with the transchoroidal approach, the transforniceal-transchoroidal approach provided a greater mean working area (transforniceal-transchoroidal 150 ± 11 mm2; transchoroidal 121 ± 8 mm2; p < 0.05), larger mean microsurgical exposure area (transforniceal-transchoroidal 101 ± 9 mm2; transchoroidal 80 ± 5 mm2; p < 0.05), larger mean angular exposure area on the longitudinal plane for the tuber cinereum (transforniceal-transchoroidal 71° ± 7°; transchoroidal 64° ± 6°; p < 0.05), and larger mean angular exposure area on the longitudinal plane for the cerebral aqueduct (transforniceal-transchoroidal 62° ± 6°; transchoroidal 55° ± 5°; p < 0.05). No differences were observed in angular exposure along the transverse axis for either anatomical target (tuber cinereum and cerebral aqueduct; p > 0.05). The mean thickness of the right frontal lobe parenchyma was 35 ± 3 mm, the mean thickness of the corpus callosum trunk was 10 ± 1 mm, and the mean longitudinal diameter of the interventricular foramen was 4.6 ± 0.4 mm. In the qualitative assessment, it was noted that the transforniceal-transchoroidal approach led to greater exposure of the third ventricle anterior region structures. There was no difference between approaches in the exposure of the structures of the middle and posterior region.CONCLUSIONSThe transforniceal-transchoroidal approach provides greater surgical exposure of the third ventricle anterior region than that offered by the transchoroidal approach. In the population studied, morphometric analysis established mean values for anatomical structures common to both approaches.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document