smoking cessation programme
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

112
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
pp. tobaccocontrol-2020-056182
Author(s):  
Olivier Desrichard ◽  
Lisa S Moussaoui ◽  
Jérôme Blondé ◽  
Max Felder ◽  
Gisana Riedo ◽  
...  

Background Programmes for collective smoking cessation, based on the British model Stoptober, are proposed by public health units in many countries. There is a need for data estimating the rate at which participants in these programmes are successful in quitting smoking. We report a prospective study carried out as part of a large-scale collective cessation programme conducted in Switzerland in 2017.Methods 1112 participants among the 7008 smokers enrolled in the collective cessation programme were recruited before the start of the attempt. Continuous abstinence was measured 10 days, 3 months and 6 months after the start of the attempt. Participants who dropped out at follow-up were considered to have failed the attempt (worst-case scenario).Results The continuous abstinence rate was at least 37.9% at 10-day follow-up, 18.8% at 3-month follow-up and 13.1% at 6-month follow-up. Similar levels of continuous abstinence as the worst-case scenario were found in sensitivity analyses including those whose quit attempt started before the beginning of the programme and where multiple imputation was used to replace dropouts. Sensitivity analyses using complete cases or an indicator of abstinence which allows occasional lapses found around double the abstinence rates.Conclusions Our results support the potential usefulness of large-scale collective cessation campaigns and suggest that such programmes based on social networks are promising areas for future smoking cessation programme activity.



Author(s):  
J Gates ◽  
D Kaklamanou ◽  
H Rupani ◽  
TP Brown ◽  
K Pilkington ◽  
...  


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e037799
Author(s):  
Nienke W Boderie ◽  
Johannes LW van Kippersluis ◽  
Diarmaid T Ó Ceallaigh ◽  
Márta K Radó ◽  
Alex Burdorf ◽  
...  

BackgroundSmoking is the primary preventable risk factor for disease and premature mortality. It is highly addictive and cessation attempts are often unsuccessful. Incentive-based programmes may be an effective method to reach sustained abstinence. Individualisation of incentives based on personal characteristics yields potential to further increase the effectiveness of incentive-based programmes.MethodA randomised controlled trial among healthcare workers recruited through their employer and signed up for a group-based smoking cessation programme. The intervention under study is the provision of personalised incentives on validated smoking cessation at several time points after the smoking cessation programme. A total of 220 participants are required. Participants are randomised 1:1 into intervention (personalised incentives) or control (no incentives). All participants join the group-based programme. Incentives are provided on validated abstinence directly after the smoking cessation programme and after 3, 6 and 12 months.Incentives are provided according to four schemes:(1) Standard: total reward size €350, pay-out scheme: €50 (t=0), €50 (t=3 months), €50 (t=6 months) and €200 (t=12 months), (2) descending: total reward size €300, pay-out scheme: €150, €100, €50 and €0, (3) ascending: total reward size: €400, pay-out scheme: €0, €0, €50 and €350 and (4) deposit: total reward size €450, pay-out scheme: €50, €50, €150, €200; participants pay a €100 deposit, returned conditional on abstinence after 6 months.Advice on which incentive scheme suits participants best is based on willingness to provide a deposit, readiness to quit, nicotine dependency and long-term or short-term reward preference. Participants are free to deviate from this advice. Abstinence is validated at each time point, with 15 months of total follow-up. The primary end point is validated abstinence at 12 months. Effectiveness will be determined by intention-to-treat analysis.Ethics and disseminationThe Erasmus MC Medical Ethics Committee decided that according to the Dutch Human Research Law (WMO), the protocol required no formal ethical approval. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and communicated to the participants.Trial registration numberNetherlands Trial Register NL7711.



2020 ◽  
Vol 90 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 19-20
Author(s):  
Christophe R. Berney


2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (11) ◽  
pp. 583-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
JHJ See ◽  
TH Yong ◽  
SLK Poh ◽  
YC Lum


Addiction ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (11) ◽  
pp. 2056-2064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young‐Gyun Seo ◽  
Yu‐Jin Paek ◽  
Min‐Woo Jo ◽  
Jaekyung Choi


Author(s):  
Robyn Whittaker ◽  
Elaine Umali ◽  
Helen Tanielu ◽  
Judith McCool


Author(s):  
Robyn Whittaker ◽  
Elaine Umali ◽  
Helen Tanielu ◽  
Judith McCool


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document