A Case Series of Very Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Resembling Junctional Tachycardia

Introduction: The surface EKG of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) shows simultaneous ventricular-atrial (RP) activation with pseudo R’ in V1 and typical heart rates ranging from 150-220/min. Slower rates are suspicious for junctional tachycardia (JT). However, occasionally we encounter typical AVNRT with slow ventricular rates. We describe a series of typical AVNRT cases with heart rates under 110/min. Methods: A total of 1972 patients with AVNRT who underwent slow pathway ablation were analyzed. Typical AVNRT was diagnosed when; 1) evidence of dual atrioventricular nodal conduction, 2) tachycardia initiation by atrial drive train with A-H-A response, 3) septal ventriculoatrial (VA) time < 70 ms, and 4) ventricular-atrial-ventricular (V-A-V) response to ventricular overdrive (VOD) pacing with post pacing interval-tachycardia cycle length (PPI-TCL) > 115ms. JT was excluded by either termination or advancement of tachycardia by atrial extrastimuli (AES) or atrial overdrive (AOD) pacing. Results: We found 11 patients (Age 20-78 years old, 6 female) who met the above-mentioned criteria. The TCL ranged from 560ms to 782ms. Except for one patient showing tachycardia termination, all patients demonstrated a V-A-V response and PPI-TCL over 115ms with VOD. AES or AOD pacing successfully excluded JT by either advancing the tachycardia in 10 patients or by tachycardia termination in one patient. Slow pathway was successfully ablated, and tachycardia was not inducible in all patients. Conclusions: This case series describes patients with typical AVNRT with slow ventricular rate (less than 110/min) who may mimic JT. We emphasize the importance of using pacing maneuvers to exclude JT.

Junctional tachycardia due to Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a 12-year-old female.

A 12-year-old girl presented with fever and signs of systemic inflammation, and found to have junctional tachycardia. She was subsequently diagnosed with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children and treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and steroids, which led to resolution of the arrhythmia.

Mechanism and interpretation of two-for-one response to premature atrial complexes during atrioventricular node re-entry tachycardia

Aims The response to premature atrial complexes (PACs) during tachycardia has been shown to differentiate atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from focal junctional tachycardia (JT). His refractory PAC (HrPACs) perturbing the next His (resetting with fusion) is diagnostic of AVNRT and such a late PAC fusing with the native beat cannot reset the focal source of JT. Early PAC advancing the immediate His with continuation of tachycardia suggests JT but can also occur in AVNRT due to simultaneous conduction through the AV nodal fast and slow pathways [two-for-one response (TFOR)]. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and mechanism of TFOR after early premature atrial complexes (ePACs) during AVNRT and to differentiate it from the known response to ePACs during JT. Methods and results Typical AVNRT cases were diagnosed using standard criteria. We evaluated the responses to scanning PACs delivered during tachycardia in 100 patients undergoing AV node slow pathway modification for AVNRT. The responses to HrPACs and ePACs delivered from coronary sinus os or high right atrium were retrospectively reviewed. In 10 patients, ePACs advanced the immediate His with continuation of tachycardia. In all 10 cases, HrPACs advanced the next His, confirming AVNRT as the mechanism, and indicating a TFOR. Conclusion A TFOR can occur in a small number of patients during AVNRT and is therefore not diagnostic of JT. However, HrPACs always perturbed the next His in these cases, confirming the diagnosis of AVNRT and allowing for differentiation from JT.