A Case Series of Very Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Resembling Junctional Tachycardia

Introduction: The surface EKG of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) shows simultaneous ventricular-atrial (RP) activation with pseudo R’ in V1 and typical heart rates ranging from 150-220/min. Slower rates are suspicious for junctional tachycardia (JT). However, occasionally we encounter typical AVNRT with slow ventricular rates. We describe a series of typical AVNRT cases with heart rates under 110/min. Methods: A total of 1972 patients with AVNRT who underwent slow pathway ablation were analyzed. Typical AVNRT was diagnosed when; 1) evidence of dual atrioventricular nodal conduction, 2) tachycardia initiation by atrial drive train with A-H-A response, 3) septal ventriculoatrial (VA) time < 70 ms, and 4) ventricular-atrial-ventricular (V-A-V) response to ventricular overdrive (VOD) pacing with post pacing interval-tachycardia cycle length (PPI-TCL) > 115ms. JT was excluded by either termination or advancement of tachycardia by atrial extrastimuli (AES) or atrial overdrive (AOD) pacing. Results: We found 11 patients (Age 20-78 years old, 6 female) who met the above-mentioned criteria. The TCL ranged from 560ms to 782ms. Except for one patient showing tachycardia termination, all patients demonstrated a V-A-V response and PPI-TCL over 115ms with VOD. AES or AOD pacing successfully excluded JT by either advancing the tachycardia in 10 patients or by tachycardia termination in one patient. Slow pathway was successfully ablated, and tachycardia was not inducible in all patients. Conclusions: This case series describes patients with typical AVNRT with slow ventricular rate (less than 110/min) who may mimic JT. We emphasize the importance of using pacing maneuvers to exclude JT.

Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Ablation Using Mini-Electrode Recordings

Catheter ablation of the slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is mainly performed using anatomical landmarks. We sought to see whether a new ablation catheter equipped with mini-electrodes may facilitate the mapping of slow pathway potentials for AVNRT ablation. We prospectively included patients referred for AVNRT in our center. Mapping and ablation were performed using an irrigated catheter equipped with 3 insulated mini-electrodes on the distal tip. Thirteen consecutive patients were included (85% female, median age 46 years). Slow pathway potentials could be identified in 77% of cases on mini-electrode bipolar tracings, versus 15% on conventional bipolar tracings (p = 0.0009). At the end of the procedure, double potentials on the ablation line were identified in all patients, only on mini-electrode bipolar tracings. Following ablation, an interval separating double potentials in sinus rhythm ≥15% of baseline tachycardia cycle length was associated with non-inducibility in all patients (p < 0.0001). No recurrence occurred during 1 year of follow-up. The use of mini-electrodes may help target slow pathway potentials during AVNRT ablation. Identification of sufficiently split double potentials on the ablation line might represent an electrophysiological endpoint in these patients.

Post-cardiac injury syndrome triggered by radiofrequency ablation for AVNRT

Background Post-cardiac injury syndrome (PCIS) is an inflammatory condition following myocardial or pericardial damage. In response to catheter ablation, PCIS most frequently occurs after extensive radiofrequency (RF) ablation of large areas of atrial myocardium. Minor myocardial injury from right septal slow pathway ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is not an established cause of the syndrome. Case presentation A 62-year-old women with a 6-year history of symptomatic narrow-complex tachycardia was referred to perform an electrophysiological study. During the procedure AVNRT was recorded and a total of two RF burns were applied to the region between the coronary sinus and the tricuspid annulus. Pericardial effusion was routinely ruled out by focused cardiac ultrasound. In the following days, the patient developed fever, elevated inflammatory and cardiac markers, new-onset pericardial effusion, characteristic ECG changes, and complained of pleuritic chest pain. An extensive workup for infectious, metabolic, rheumatologic, neoplastic, and toxic causes of pericarditis and myocarditis was unremarkable. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed no signs of ischemia, infiltrative disease or structural abnormalities. The patient was diagnosed with PCIS and initiated on aspirin and low-dose colchicine. At a 1-month follow-up visit the patient was free of symptoms but still had a small pericardial effusion. After three months of treatment the pericardial effusion had resolved completely. Conclusions Inflammatory pericardial reactions can occur after minor myocardial damage from RF ablation without involvement of structures in close proximity to the pericardium.

Characteristics and Long-Term Ablation Outcomes of Supraventricular Arrhythmias in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A 10-Year, Single-Center Experience

Background: A variety of supraventricular arrhythmias (SVAs) may occur in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The characteristics and long-term ablation outcomes of different types of SVAs in HCM have not been comprehensively investigated.Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 101 consecutive patients with HCM who were referred to the electrophysiology and arrhythmia service from May 2010 to October 2020. The clinical features and ablation outcomes were analyzed.Results: Seventy-eight patients had SVAs, which comprised 50 (64.1%) cases of atrial fibrillation (AF), 16 (20.5%) of atrial flutter (AFL), 15 (19.2%) of atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), 11 (14.1%) of atrial arrhythmia (AT), and 3 (3.8%) of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Thirty-four patients underwent catheter ablation and were followed up for a median (interquartile range) of 58.5 (82.9) months. There was no recurrence in patients with non-AF SVAs. In patients with AF, the 1- and 7-year AF-free survival rates were 87.5 and 49.5%, respectively. A receiver operator characteristic analysis showed that a greater left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) was associated with a higher recurrence of AF, with an optimum cutoff value of 47 mm (c-statistic = 0.91, p = 0.011, sensitivity = 1.00, specificity = 0.82). In Kaplan–Meier analysis, patients with a LVEDD ≥ 47 mm had worse AF-free survival than those with a LVEDD &lt;47 mm (log-rank p = 0.014).Conclusions: In this unique population of HCM, AF was the most common SVA, followed in order by AFL, AVRT, AT, and AVNRT. The long-term catheter ablation outcome for non-AF SVAs in HCM is satisfactory. A greater LVEDD predicts AF recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with HCM.