hierarchical planning
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

160
(FIVE YEARS 35)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyang Wang ◽  
Zhixian Ye ◽  
Liangjun Zhang

Author(s):  
Juliana Vilela ◽  
Richard Hill

AbstractHierarchy is a tool that has been applied to improve the scalability of solving planning problems modeled using Supervisory Control Theory. In the work of Hill and Lafortune (2016), the notion of cost equivalence was employed to generate an abstraction of the supervisor that, with additional conditions, guarantees that an optimal plan generated on the abstraction is also optimal when applied to the full supervisor. Their work is able to improve their abstraction by artificially giving transitions zero cost based on the sequentially-dependent ordering of events. Here, we relax the requirement on a specific ordering of the dependent events, while maintaining the optimal relationship between upper and lower levels of the hierarchy. This present paper also extends the authors’ work (Vilela and Hill 2020) where we developed a new notion of equivalence based on cost equivalence and weak bisimulation that we term priced-observation equivalence. This equivalence allows the supervisor abstraction to be generated compositionally. This helps to avoid the explosion of the state space that arises from having to first synthesize the full supervisor before the abstraction can be applied. Here, we also show that models with artificial zero-cost transitions can be created compositionally employing the new relaxed sequential dependence definition. An example cooperative robot control application is used to demonstrate the improvements achieved by the compositional approach to abstraction proposed by this paper.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yifeng Zhu ◽  
Jonathan Tremblay ◽  
Stan Birchfield ◽  
Yuke Zhu

Author(s):  
Mohamed Elkawkagy* ◽  
Elbeh Heba

While several approaches have been developed to enhance the efficiency of hierarchical Artificial Intelligence planning (AI-planning), complex problems in AI-planning are challenging to overcome. To find a solution plan, the hierarchical planner produces a huge search space that may be infinite. A planner whose small search space is likely to be more efficient than a planner produces a large search space. In this paper, we will present a new approach to integrating hierarchical AI-planning with the map-reduce paradigm. In the mapping part, we will apply the proposed clustering technique to divide the hierarchical planning problem into smaller problems, so-called sub-problems. A pre-processing technique is conducted for each sub-problem to reduce a declarative hierarchical planning domain model and then find an individual solution for each so-called sub-problem sub-plan. In the reduction part, the conflict between sub-plans is resolved to provide a general solution plan to the given hierarchical AI-planning problem. Preprocessing phase helps the planner cut off the hierarchical planning search space for each sub-problem by removing the compulsory literal elements that help the hierarchical planner seek a solution. The proposed approach has been fully implemented successfully, and some experimental results findings will be provided as proof of our approach's substantial improvement inefficiency.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 779-786
Author(s):  
Boyu Zhou ◽  
Yichen Zhang ◽  
Xinyi Chen ◽  
Shaojie Shen

Author(s):  
Daniel Höller ◽  
Gregor Behnke ◽  
Pascal Bercher ◽  
Susanne Biundo

AbstractDuring the last years, much progress has been made in hierarchical planning towards domain-independent systems that come with sophisticated techniques to solve planning problems instead of relying on advice in the input model. Several of these novel methods have been integrated into the PANDA framework, which is a software system to reason about hierarchical planning tasks. Besides solvers for planning problems based on plan space search, progression search, and translation to propositional logic, it also includes techniques for related problems like plan repair, plan and goal recognition, or plan verification. These various techniques share a common infrastructure, like e.g. a standard input language or components for grounding and reachability analysis. This article gives an overview over the PANDA framework, introduces the basic techniques from a high level perspective, and surveys the literature describing the diverse components in detail.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document