hidden allergens
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

25
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Foods ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 655
Author(s):  
Anna Jędrusek-Golińska ◽  
Dorota Piasecka-Kwiatkowska ◽  
Paulina Zielińska ◽  
Magdalena Zielińska-Dawidziak ◽  
Krystyna Szymandera-Buszka ◽  
...  

The special properties of soy preparations make them common additives for food production and can be dangerous for sensitive individuals. Our aim was to check consumers’ awareness of potential risks of soy preparations added to numerous food products, depending on respondents’ education, and to evaluate immunoreactive properties of chosen soy preparations. A personal questionnaire was used. Respondents (n = 251) were aged 23–28 years old, lived in Poland, and were graduates or students in their last year of food technology, medicine, and university of technology. The slot blot and Western blotting methods were used to mark immunoreactivity of soy preparations. It was shown that most respondents often or usually read labels of food products they buy. The surveyed indicated protein is the allergenic component in soy. Almost half of them were of the opinion that hydrolysis removes the allergenic properties of soy. Most of the medical students surveyed thought that people allergic to soy may consume products that contain soy preparations. The analytical results indicated that soy preparation contained protein fractions that were immunoreactive with sera of allergenic patients. It was proven that preparations, even hydrolysates, contain immunoreactive proteins that may be the source of hidden allergens, even though they are not recognized as dangerous by well-educated respondents.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 2175-2176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morten Schjørring Opstrup ◽  
Lene Heise Garvey
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Grace Baker ◽  
Sarah Saf ◽  
Angela Tsuang ◽  
Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn

2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
pp. AB245
Author(s):  
Jae-Won Oh ◽  
Yeo-Soon Chang ◽  
Ha-Na Kang ◽  
Young-Jin Choi
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. García Rodríguez ◽  
J. Borja ◽  
B. Bartolomé ◽  
E. Gómez Torrijos ◽  
R. García Rodríguez
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Sánchez-Borges ◽  
Enrique Fernandez-Caldas
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ciccarelli ◽  
Claudia Calabrò ◽  
Clara Imperatore ◽  
Guglielmo Scala

A case of anaphylaxis is reported in the course of a prick by prick with Lupinus albus and roasted peanut in a 20-year-old woman. We focused on some main topics. First of all it seems important to underscore the potential risks connected to the practice of the prick-by-prick with fresh foods in allergic patients, especially when testing cross-reactive substances, such as White Lupine, peanuts, or soy. It is important that clinicians who perform prick tests be aware of the risk related with in vivo tests in allergic patients. Second, we discuss the problem of the hidden allergens, such as White Lupine flour, or soy flour which are utilized to improve wheat flour because of their lower cost. Patients with a demonstrated allergy to peanuts should be assessed for lupine allergy and informed about the “hidden allergens” issue. Finally, we believe that component resolved diagnosis, the serum specific IgE against molecular components, that is normally considered a second-level diagnostic step has an important role even as a first line approach at least in some selected cases.


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 292-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni A. Zurzolo ◽  
Michael L. Mathai ◽  
Jennifer J. Koplin ◽  
Katrina J. Allen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document