loudness recruitment
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

57
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon M. Lefler ◽  
Robert K. Duncan ◽  
Shawn S. Goodman ◽  
John J. Guinan ◽  
Jeffery T. Lichtenhan

Background: Loudness recruitment is commonly experienced by patients with putative endolymphatic hydrops. Loudness recruitment is abnormal loudness growth with high-level sounds being perceived as having normal loudness even though hearing thresholds are elevated. The traditional interpretation of recruitment is that cochlear amplification has been reduced. Since the cochlear amplifier acts primarily at low sound levels, an ear with elevated thresholds from reduced cochlear amplification can have normal processing at high sound levels. In humans, recruitment can be studied using perceptual loudness but in animals physiological measurements are used. Recruitment in animal auditory-nerve responses has never been unequivocally demonstrated because the animals used had damage to sensory and neural cells, not solely a reduction of cochlear amplification. Investigators have thus looked for, and found, evidence of recruitment in the auditory central nervous system (CNS). While studies on CNS recruitment are informative, they cannot rule out the traditional interpretation of recruitment originating in the cochlea.Design: We used techniques that could assess hearing function throughout entire frequency- and dynamic-range of hearing. Measurements were made from two animal models: guinea-pig ears with endolymphatic-sac-ablation surgery to produce endolymphatic hydrops, and naïve guinea-pig ears with cochlear perfusions of 13 mM 2-Hydroxypropyl-Beta-Cyclodextrin (HPBCD) in artificial perilymph. Endolymphatic sac ablation caused low-frequency loss. Animals treated with HPBCD had hearing loss at all frequencies. None of these animals had loss of hair cells or synapses on auditory nerve fibers.Results: In ears with endolymphatic hydrops and those perfused with HPBCD, auditory-nerve based measurements at low frequencies showed recruitment compared to controls. Recruitment was not found at high frequencies (> 4 kHz) where hearing thresholds were normal in ears with endolymphatic hydrops and elevated in ears treated with HPBCD.Conclusions: We found compelling evidence of recruitment in auditory-nerve data. Such clear evidence has never been shown before. Our findings suggest that, in patients suspected of having endolymphatic hydrops, loudness recruitment may be a good indication that the associated low-frequency hearing loss originates from a reduction of cochlear amplification, and that measurements of recruitment could be used in differential diagnosis and treatment monitoring of Ménière's disease.


Author(s):  
Kelly E. Radziwon ◽  
Senthilvelan Manohar ◽  
Benjamin Auerbach ◽  
Xiaopeng Liu ◽  
Guang-Di Chen ◽  
...  

Neuroscience ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 422 ◽  
pp. 212-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Radziwon ◽  
Benjamin D. Auerbach ◽  
Dalian Ding ◽  
Xiaopeng Liu ◽  
Guang-Di Chen ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 340-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph W. Hall ◽  
John H. Grose ◽  
Emily Buss ◽  
Debora R. Hatch

The first experiment investigated the effects of mild to moderate sensorineural hearing impairment on temporal analysis for noise stimuli of varying bandwidth. Tasks of temporal gap detection, amplitude modulation (AM) detection, and AM discrimination were examined. Relatively high levels of stimulation were used in order to reduce the possibility that the results of the listeners with hearing impairment would be influenced strongly by audibility. A general summary of results was that there was relatively great interlistener variation among the listeners with hearing impairment, with most listeners showing normal performance and some showing degraded performance, regardless of the bandwidth of the stimulus carrying the temporal information. A second experiment investigated the hypothesis that listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment might have poor gap detection due to loudness recruitment. Here, gap markers were presented at levels where loudness growth was steeper for the listeners with hearing impairment than for the listeners with normal hearing. Although gap detection was sometimes poorer in listeners with hearing impairment than in listeners with normal hearing, there was no clear relation between gap detection performance and loudness recruitment in listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing impairment.


1996 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 481-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C. J. Moore ◽  
Magdalena Wojtczak ◽  
Deborah A. Vickers

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document