Zonal Fixation in Revision TKA: The Key Is Metaphyseal Fixation

As the volume of primary total knee arthroplasties continues to rise, so will the volume of revision arthroplasties. Bone loss is commonly encountered in revision surgery and must be managed appropriately to optimize outcomes. The concept of zonal fixation highlights the importance of attaining secure fixation within each of the three major osseous zones: the epiphysis, the metaphysis, and the diaphysis. While each zone is important, the metaphysis carries particular significance. The development of new implants such as metaphyseal cones and sleeves has greatly expanded the orthopedic surgeon's armamentarium to allow for solid metaphyseal fixation in virtually every case.

3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems

Aims Porous metaphyseal cones can be used for fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and complex TKAs. This metaphyseal fixation has led to some surgeons using shorter cemented stems instead of diaphyseal engaging cementless stems with a potential benefit of ease of obtaining proper alignment without being beholden to the diaphysis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate short term clinical and radiographic outcomes of a series of TKA cases performed using 3D-printed metaphyseal cones. Methods A retrospective review of 86 rTKAs and nine complex primary TKAs, with an average age of 63.2 years (SD 8.2) and BMI of 34.0 kg/m2 (SD 8.7), in which metaphyseal cones were used for both femoral and tibial fixation were compared for their knee alignment based on the type of stem used. Overall, 22 knees had cementless stems on both sides, 52 had cemented stems on both sides, and 15 had mixed stems. Postoperative long-standing radiographs were evaluated for coronal and sagittal plane alignment. Adjusted logistic regression models were run to assess malalignment hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment beyond ± 3° and sagittal alignment of the tibial and femoral components ± 3° by stem type. Results No patients had a revision of a cone due to aseptic loosening; however, two had revision surgery due to infection. In all, 26 (27%) patients had HKA malalignment; nine (9.5%) patients had sagittal plane malalignment, five (5.6%) of the tibia, and four (10.8%) of the femur. After adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, there was a significantly increased risk for malalignment when a cone was used and both the femur and tibia had cementless compared to cemented stems (odds ratio 3.19, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 10.05). Conclusion Porous 3D-printed cones provide excellent metaphyseal fixation. However, these central cones make the use of offset couplers difficult and may generate malalignment with cementless stems. We found 3.19-times higher odds of malalignment in our TKAs performed with metaphyseal cones and both femoral and tibial cementless stems. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):150–157.

Preservación ósea femoral con tallos cortos de fijación cervicometafisaria. [Femoral bone preservation using short stems with metaphyseal fixation]

<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span><strong>RESUMEN</strong><br /> </span></p><p><span><em><strong>Introducción:</strong></em> l</span><span>os tallos no cementados recubiertos con hidroxiapatita de fijación metafisaria han logrado excelentes resultados a largo plazo. La segunda generación de tallos cortos de fijación cervicometafisaria ha surgido a principios de la década de 1990, con el objetivo de preservar capital óseo femoral. Sin embargo, la preservación ósea femoral teóricamente propuesta no ha sido comprobada. El objetivo de este trabajo es determinar radiográficamente la preservación del capital óseo femoral cuando se utilizó un tallo corto de fijación cervicometafisaria, comparando las radiografías posoperatorias con la programación del tallo que se debería haber utilizado en caso de ser un diseño convencional con fijación metafisaria. </span></p><p><em><strong>Materiales y Métodos: </strong></em><span>los primeros 50 tallos cortos de fijación cervicometafisaria (MiniHip</span><span>TM</span><span>, Corin, Cirencester, Reino Unido) fueron analizados por dos observadores independientes, con radiografías de frente, en cuanto a nivel de resección cervical y longitud del tallo, comparándolos con las filminas de un tallo convencional de fijación metafisodiafisaria (MetaFix</span><span>TM</span><span>, Corin, Cirencester, Reino Unido).</span></p><p><em><strong>Resultados: </strong></em><span>según el análisis radiográfico, los tallos cortos de fijación cervicometafisaria ocuparon una longitud femoral promedio de 79 mm (rango 68-102). Los tallos convencionales de fijación metafisaria hubiesen ocupado, en promedio, 73 mm más que los tallos cortos (rango 47-94). Esta distribución se observó en el corte de cuello (promedio 10 mm más distal) y en la longitud del implante (promedio 66 mm mayor longitud) (p &lt;0,001). Esta diferencia permite preservar un 42% el capital óseo femoral. </span></p><div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span><em><strong>Conclusión:</strong></em> l</span><span>a preservación ósea relacionada con el uso de tallos cortos de fijación cervicometafisaria podría traer beneficios a largo plazo en pacientes jóvenes con alta demanda funcional. </span></p><p> </p></div></div></div></div></div></div>