urethral dilatation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

60
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. e368
Author(s):  
S. Bugeja ◽  
A. Frost ◽  
S. Ivaz ◽  
N. Jeffrey ◽  
M. Dragova ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. e512
Author(s):  
Simon Bugeja* ◽  
Anastasia Frost ◽  
Stella Ivaz ◽  
Nikki Jeffrey ◽  
Mariya Dragova ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-265
Author(s):  
Magda Mahmoud Ali ◽  
Kamal Hany Hussein ◽  
Ahmed Sadek ◽  
Abdelbaset Eweda Abdelbaset

Background and Aim: Congenital anomalies of the urinary system are common affections in ruminants. Dilatation of the pelvic urethra is one of these affections in which the pelvic urethra dilated than normal diameter. This study aimed to explain the diagnosis and surgical treatment of urethral dilatation in cattle calves. Materials and Methods: Twenty-three bull calves (2-7 months old) were presented with a history of stranguria, tenesmus, and straining. Diagnosis of urethral dilatation was relied on the case history and clinical examination and was confirmed using survey and contrast radiography, ultrasonography, and biochemical tests. Treatment was done by urethrostomy under the effect of local infiltration analgesia. Results: Physical examination revealed the presence of an oval, firm, and painless swelling at the perineal region, starting just below the anus and extended to the base of the scrotum. The owners reported that the initial swelling size and severity of symptoms increased with the progress of animal age. Biochemical findings revealed non-significant changes in blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels. Radiographic findings showed an oval radiopaque mass. However, a well-demarcated structure with acoustic enhancement was detected on ultrasonographic examination. Urethrostomy resulted in a successful outcome of all cases. Conclusion: Depending on these findings, ultrasonography is the most reliable diagnostic tool and urethrostomy is the intervention of choice with acceptable results for diagnosis and treatment of urethral dilatation in cattle calves, respectively.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilay Hakan ◽  
Suleyman Cuneyt Karakus ◽  
Mustafa Aydin ◽  
Alev Suzen ◽  
Nurcan Cengiz

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Kwan Park ◽  
Ji Yong Kim ◽  
Jae Hyung You ◽  
Bo Ram Choi ◽  
Sung Chul Kam ◽  
...  

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative urethral dilatation during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) on the prevention of urethral stricture. Methods: A total of 72 patients without urethral stricture underwent HoLEP for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Recruited patients were randomly divided into two groups (groups A and B). Patients in group A (36 patients, experimental group) received preoperative urethral dilatation and patients in group B (36 patients, control group) did not. Each patient was evaluated at four weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after surgery. The effectiveness of preoperative urethral dilatation was evaluated based on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), peak urine flow rate (Qmax), voided volume, and post-void residual (PVR) volume. To diagnose urethral stricture, Qmax <10 mL/s, as assessed using uroflowmetry and findings of visualization through retrograde urethrography and urethroscopy, were used. Results: Among 72 initial participants, 33 patients in group A and 31 patients in group B completed the experiment. Preoperative characteristics were well-balanced between groups. At each postoperative visit, there was no significant difference in voiding symptoms between groups. Two patients (6.06%) in group A and five patients (15.15%) in group B showed a Qmax <10 mL/s on uroflowmetry (p=0.013). On urethroscopy, no patient in group A (0%) and two patients in group B (6.45%) (p=0.021) showed urethral stricture after HoLEP. Conclusions: Preoperative urethral dilatation during HoLEP decreased the incidence of urethral stricture. This procedure could be useful to reduce the risk of urethral stricture after transurethral prostate surgery. One limitation of the current study is the single-centre design. Also, we sought to determine the efficacy of preoperative urethral dilatation for the prevention of urethral stricture after transurethral prostate surgery within a short time period, which could be another limitation of the study. Despite these limitations, to the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first reported prospective, randomized trial analyzing the safety and efficacy of preoperative urethral dilatation for the prevention of urethral stricture after transurethral prostate surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document