Microhabitat use and body size drive the evolution of colour patterns in snapping shrimps (Decapoda: Alpheidae: Alpheus)

Background matching and disruptive coloration are common strategies used by animals to increase concealment, whereas motion-dazzle may prevent capture after recognition. Studies have related background matching to habitat dependency and survival success, whereas for animals with highly contrasting patterns it has been shown that they are able to explore a broader range of habitats due to disruptive coloration, and possibly via motion-dazzle. However, the effects of these strategies are likely to be influenced by body size and to work better for smaller species. We applied phylogenetic comparative methods to test the hypothesis that smaller snapping shrimps (genus Alpheus) with high-contrast stripes would be able to utilize more microhabitats than non-striped and larger species. We used a published phylogeny of the American species of Alpheus, studies that have described alpheid microhabitats and size, and high-resolution photographs of each species in the phylogeny. Our categorical analysis suggested that generalist snapping shrimps are more likely to have stripes than specialist shrimps, and this effect was stronger in smaller species. Similarly, we found an interacting effect of body size and habitat use on the degree of luminance contrast: smaller generalist species had higher contrast values than average-sized and habitat-specialist species. Therefore, predators, body size and frequency of microhabitats are likely to have influenced the evolution of colour patterns in Alpheus.

Disruptive coloration and binocular disparity: breaking camouflage

Many species employ camouflage to disguise their true shape and avoid detection or recognition. Disruptive coloration is a form of camouflage in which high-contrast patterns obscure internal features or break up an animal's outline. In particular, edge enhancement creates illusory, or ‘fake’ depth edges within the animal's body. Disruptive coloration often co-occurs with background matching, and together, these strategies make it difficult for an observer to visually segment an animal from its background. However, stereoscopic vision could provide a critical advantage in the arms race between perception and camouflage: the depth information provided by binocular disparities reveals the true three-dimensional layout of a scene, and might, therefore, help an observer to overcome the effects of disruptive coloration. Human observers located snake targets embedded in leafy backgrounds. We analysed performance (response time) as a function of edge enhancement, illumination conditions and the availability of binocular depth cues. We confirm that edge enhancement contributes to effective camouflage: observers were slower to find snakes whose patterning contains ‘fake’ depth edges. Importantly, however, this effect disappeared when binocular depth cues were available. Illumination also affected detection: under directional illumination, where both the leaves and snake produced strong cast shadows, snake targets were localized more quickly than in scenes rendered under ambient illumination. In summary, we show that illusory depth edges, created via disruptive coloration, help to conceal targets from human observers. However, cast shadows and binocular depth information improve detection by providing information about the true three-dimensional structure of a scene. Importantly, the strong interaction between disparity and edge enhancement suggests that stereoscopic vision has a critical role in breaking camouflage, enabling the observer to overcome the disruptive effects of edge enhancement.

Disruptive coloration and habitat use by seahorses

ABSTRACT Predation avoidance is a primary factor influencing survival. Therefore, any trait that affects the risk of predation, such as camouflage, is expected to be under selection pressure. Background matching (homochromy) limits habitat use, especially if the habitat is heterogeneous. Another camouflage mechanism is disruptive coloration, which reduces the probability of detection by masking the prey’s body contours. Here we evaluated if disruptive coloration in the longsnout seahorse, Hippocampus reidi, allows habitat use diversification. We analyzed 82 photographs of animals, comparing animal and background color, and registering anchorage substrate (holdfast). We tested whether the presence (disruptive coloration) or absence of bands (plain coloration) predicted occupation of backgrounds of different colors. We also calculated the connectance between seahorse morph and background color or holdfast, as well as whether color morph differed in their preferences for holdfast. Animals with disruptive coloration were more likely to be found in environments with colors different from their own. Furthermore, animals with disruptive coloration occupied more diversified habitats, but as many holdfasts as plain colored animals. Therefore, animals with disruptive coloration were less selective in habitat use than those lacking disruptive color patterns, which agrees with the disruptive coloration hypothesis.