prothonotary warblers
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

27
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (12) ◽  
pp. 1109-1115
Author(s):  
A.J. Mueller ◽  
D.J. Twedt ◽  
E.K. Bowers

Breeding territory selection in Prothonotary Warblers (Protonotaria citrea (Boddaert, 1783)) is thought to hinge on standing water, with a strong preference for low-lying areas prone to seasonal flooding. However, we have observed this species nesting in much drier areas than previously reported. We recently initiated a study of the Carolina Wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus (Latham, 1790)) using wooden nest boxes, and nearly 60% of all nests produced in these boxes during the initial study year were produced by Prothonotary Warblers, despite this species being absent from our field site during the year preceding nest-box availability. Most nests were produced in dense, closed-canopy forest with a thick shrub layer >100 m from any water body. There was no difference in the mean distance from water between nests of the Prothonotary Warbler and those of the Carolina Wren, a habitat generalist that does not nest over water. We then observed a 60% increase in the number of Prothonotary Warbler nests the following year, along with significant increases in breeding productivity. Although they nested on sites that they are not thought to prefer, our observations suggest that Prothonotary Warblers may nest in drier areas than usual if appropriate nest cavities are provided.


The Auk ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 136 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan C Slevin ◽  
Lesley P Bulluck ◽  
Alix E Matthews ◽  
Than J Boves

Abstract Many birds use conspicuous plumage coloration to signal quality for sexual or social selection. However, it is still often unclear how intraspecific coloration and associated signaling vary spatially. Plumage coloration that is dependent on carotenoids may be ideal for studying spatial color variation because birds cannot naturally synthesize this pigment; therefore, bird coloration from carotenoids is at least partially contingent upon diet. As food availability often varies spatially, so might color and its signaling strength. While male coloration has received more research focus, less is known about female coloration and its relationships with social rank or sexual quality. To further improve our understanding of spatial variation in plumage coloration and correlations with individual quality, we compared Prothonotary Warblers breeding at 2 ecologically disparate sites separated by 1,300 km: in bottomland forests of Arkansas, USA, and the forests near the tidal freshwater James River in Virginia, USA. We assessed crown and breast plumage coloration for both sexes and compared several color metrics between sites. We then assessed surrogates of female quality (number of young fledged, number of eggs laid, provisioning rate, apparent annual survival, and nest depredation) and compared coloration-quality relationships between sites. We found that coloration of birds breeding in Arkansas was generally more elaborate than those breeding in Virginia. However, this was somewhat dependent on sex: females showed greater differences than males between sites. Additionally, color metrics of females breeding in Virginia showed stronger relationships with quality (all 5 quality metrics) than for birds breeding in Arkansas (only provisioning rate and nest depredation). Proximately, spatial variation in plumage coloration and the associated signaling may be explained by differences in diet between sites. Ultimately, spatial variation in intra- and intersexual selection pressures may explain how spatial variation in plumage signal strength evolved.


The Auk ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 229-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley P. Bulluck ◽  
Miran J. Foster ◽  
Samantha Kay ◽  
Donald E. Cox ◽  
Catherine Viverette ◽  
...  

The Auk ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 298-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna M. Tucker ◽  
Rodney J. Dyer ◽  
Sarah K. Huber ◽  
Lesley P. Bulluck

The Condor ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared D. Wolfe ◽  
Matthew D. Johnson ◽  
C. John Ralph

2012 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena L. Grillo ◽  
Robert C. Fithian ◽  
Heather Cross ◽  
Catherine Wallace ◽  
Catherine Viverette ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document