overall analysis method
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

4
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

0
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Xu Dai ◽  
Wenyong Weng ◽  
Guanlin Chen ◽  
Jiang He ◽  
Jiapeng Shen

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Guanlin Chen ◽  
Jiapeng Shen ◽  
Jiang He ◽  
Xu Dai ◽  
Wenyong Weng

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Xiangguo Zeng ◽  
Ying Sheng ◽  
Huayan Chen ◽  
Tixin Han

A common measure of deformation between atomic scale simulations and the continuum framework is provided and the strain tensors for multiscale simulations are defined in this paper. In order to compute the deformation gradient of any atomm, the weight function is proposed to eliminate the different contributions within the neighbor atoms which have different distances to atomm, and the weighted least squares error optimization model is established to seek the optimal coefficients of the weight function and the optimal local deformation gradient of each atom. The optimization model involves more than 9 parameters. To guarantee the reliability of subsequent parameters identification result and lighten the calculation workload of parameters identification, an overall analysis method of parameter sensitivity and an advanced genetic algorithm are also developed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 494-495 ◽  
pp. 668-672
Author(s):  
Yuan Zhuang ◽  
Zhong De Shan ◽  
Qian Zhang

The finite element method (FEM) has been used for an independent analysis of forklift truck components. However, the accuracy of such an analysis may not be reliable because it does not in view of the interaction of the forces transferred between components. Here, we analyze the mast system as a whole using an FEM based on a simulation chain method employing MPC184 units, as well as a method to analyze components independently. Both methods are used to simulate the stress of the upper beam of the inner mast. We then compare the maximum stresses calculated using the two different methods under three sets of working conditions. The data show that, in comparison with theoretical results, the average error rate of the overall analysis method was 4.71%, while that of the independent analysis was 33.3%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document