venous distensibility
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

61
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Putie Hapsari ◽  
Teguh Marfen Djajakusumah ◽  
Zacky Fauzie ◽  
Muhammad Faiz Ulurrosyad

Introduction: Patients with end stage renal disease require hemodialysis. Radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula is the main choice of vascular access in patients who undergo hemodialysis procedure. Physiological vein distensibility is an important aspect in forming a mature arteriovenous fistula. This study aims to analyze the correlation between preoperative distensibility and arteriovenous fistula maturation. Method: Data are collected from end stage renal disease patients in Hasan Sadikin Hospital and RA Habibie Hospitals that will go through radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula procedure during the period of October 2018 to February 2019. Vein distension procedure is performed before the operation and maturation is evaluated four to six weeks after the operation. The comparison of preoperative venous distensibility in two different groups of arteriovenous fistula maturation category is analyzed using chi square test model. Result: This study found that preoperative venous distensibility value affects arteriovenous fistula maturation with a statistical significance (p-value = 0.007), yielding a contingency coefficient of 0.553, and a very strong relation value of 0.782. Conclusion: Preoperative vein distensibility of more than 30% is predictive of successful arteriovenous maturation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 963-968
Author(s):  
Guocun Hou ◽  
Yi Hou ◽  
Xiuli Sun ◽  
Na Yin ◽  
Guozhen Feng ◽  
...  

Background: Many studies suggested that the optimal cephalic vein diameter for wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula construction should be at least 2 mm to predict successful maturation and primary patency. However, our experience has shown that many patients with smaller cephalic vein diameter (≤2 mm) in the neutral state (without a tourniquet) also have good clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify predictors that affect primary survival of new wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula in patients with cephalic vein diameter ≤2 mm. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 50 patients with preoperative cephalic vein diameters ≤2 mm in the neutral state who underwent wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula construction between September 2016 and October 2019. Internal diameters of the cephalic vein and radial artery, venous distensibility, peak systolic velocity, and resistance index of the radial artery were determined by ultrasound examination before wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula placement. Patients were divided into two groups: failure and survival. Results: The radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula survival rate was 68% from the time of radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula creation until the end of the study. Univariate analysis showed that larger venous distensibility (p < 0.001), non-diabetic kidney disease (p = 0.009), and slower peak systolic velocity of the radial artery (p = 0.033) were predictive factors for primary radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula survival. Multivariate regression analysis revealed good venous distensibility (odds ratio = 9.637, 95% confidence interval = 1.893–49.050, p = 0.006) and non-diabetic kidney disease (odds ratio = 0.148, 95% confidence interval = 0.033–0.660, p = 0.012) to be independent predictors for primary radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula survival. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that venous distensibility >0.52 mm (sensitivity: 70.6%, specificity: 68.8%) was the best cut-off value to predict primary radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula survival. Conclusion: When cephalic veins with diameter ≤2 mm are found, venous distensibility should be used to aid in the surgery decision-making process. The outcome of wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula survival would be significantly improved through the use of cephalic vein with venous distensibility >0.52 mm.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. i543-i543
Author(s):  
Tamara Jemcov ◽  
Ivanka Markovic ◽  
Milan Radovic

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 1094-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Tae Kim ◽  
Woon Ha Chang ◽  
Tae Yun Oh ◽  
Young Kyun Jeong

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Ping Chung ◽  
A-Ching Chao ◽  
Hung-Yi Hsu ◽  
Shing-Jong Lin ◽  
Han-Hwa Hu

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Jeanneret ◽  
K.A. Jäger ◽  
C.E. Zaugg ◽  
U. Hoffmann

2007 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 398
Author(s):  
C. Jeanneret ◽  
K.A. Jäger ◽  
C.E. Zaugg ◽  
U. Hoffmann

2007 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 347 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Nils Planken ◽  
Tim Leiner ◽  
Jan H.M. Tordoir

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document