color vision tests
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

61
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Ali Almustanyir ◽  
Reema Alduhayan ◽  
Mosaad Alhassan ◽  
Kholoud Bokhary ◽  
Balsam Alabdulkader

Author(s):  
Venkata N.V. Varikuti ◽  
Charles Zhang ◽  
Brandon Clair ◽  
Andrew L. Reynolds

2020 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 332-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Almustanyir ◽  
Jeffery K. Hovis

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiko Sato ◽  
Takaaki Inoue ◽  
Shuto Tamura ◽  
Hironori Takimoto

AbstractPrevious studies have shown that with the use of tinted lenses (or colored filters), individuals with red–green color vision deficiency (CVD) report an improvement in their performance on certain color vision tests. In this context, this study examines the effects of a digitally generated red-colored filter and identifies the mechanism mainly responsible for the changes in red–green CVD observers’ performance on a D-15 arrangement test performed using the filter. We simulate the red filter digitally with the spectral transmittance similar to that of the X-Chrom, which is a red-tinted lens. Fourteen red–green CVD subjects are subjected to the D-15 test on a computer monitor under four filter conditions, consisting of one condition without the filter and three conditions with the filter, corresponding to the opacity of the red filter. The results show that while the simulated red filter improves the performance of deutans to arrange the caps in the D-15 test, this is not the case for protans. In addition, considerations based on the human cone-contrast model enable us to identify that the improvement in deutan observers largely results from the increase in the luminance contrast between stimuli and a background. To summarize, the red filter simulated in this study induces different changes in the red–green CVD observer luminance contrast between the protan and deutan types, with the result that the performance of deuteranopes improves while that of protanopes deteriorates.


2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (8) ◽  
pp. 737-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Marechal ◽  
Maxime Delbarre ◽  
Joachim Tesson ◽  
Carole Lacambre ◽  
Hélène Lefebvre ◽  
...  

i-Perception ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 204166951876419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Feitosa-Santana ◽  
Margaret Lutze ◽  
Pablo A. Barrionuevo ◽  
Dingcai Cao

Based on known color vision theories, there is no complete explanation for the perceptual dichotomy of #TheDress in which most people see either white-and-gold (WG) or blue-and-black (BK). We determined whether some standard color vision tests (i.e., color naming, color matching, anomaloscope settings, unique white settings, and color preferences), as well as chronotypes, could provide information on the color perceptions of #TheDress. Fifty-two young observers were tested. Fifteen of the observers (29%) reported the colors as BK, 21 (40%) as WG, and 16 (31%) reported a different combination of colors. Observers who perceived WG required significantly more blue in their unique white settings than those who perceived BK. The BK, blue-and-gold, and WG observer groups had significantly different color preferences for the light cyan chip. Moreland equation anomaloscope matching showed a significant difference between WG and BK observers. In addition, #TheDress color perception categories, color preference outcomes, and unique white settings had a common association. For both the bright and dark regions of #TheDress, the color matching chromaticities formed a continuum, approximately following the daylight chromaticity locus. Color matching to the bright region of #TheDress showed two nearly distinct clusters (WG vs. BK) along the daylight chromaticity locus and there was a clear cutoff for reporting WG versus BK. All results showing a significant difference involved blue percepts, possibly due to interpretations of the illuminant interactions with the dress material. This suggests that variations in attributing blueness to the #TheDress image may be significant variables determining color perception of #TheDress.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta A. Szmigiel ◽  
Malwina Geniusz ◽  
Maciej K. Geniusz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document