enclosure methods
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

26
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 742-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tommi Brander ◽  
Bastian Harrach ◽  
Manas Kar ◽  
Mikko Salo




2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Eggers ◽  
Nacim Ramdani ◽  
Nedialko S. Nedialkov ◽  
Martin Fränzle


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
W. R. McGillis ◽  
C. Langdon ◽  
B. Loose ◽  
K. K. Yates ◽  
Jorge Corredor




2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 222-230
Author(s):  
Baghdad Science Journal

Interval methods for verified integration of initial value problems (IVPs) for ODEs have been used for more than 40 years. For many classes of IVPs, these methods have the ability to compute guaranteed error bounds for the flow of an ODE, where traditional methods provide only approximations to a solution. Overestimation, however, is a potential drawback of verified methods. For some problems, the computed error bounds become overly pessimistic, or integration even breaks down. The dependency problem and the wrapping effect are particular sources of overestimations in interval computations. Berz (see [1]) and his co-workers have developed Taylor model methods, which extend interval arithmetic with symbolic computations. The latter is an effective tool for reducing both the dependency problem and the wrapping effect. By construction, Taylor model methods appear particularly suitable for integrating nonlinear ODEs. In this paper, we analyze Taylor model based integration of ODEs and compare Taylor model with traditional enclosure methods for IVPs for ODEs. More advanced Taylor model integration methods are discussed in the algorithm (1). For clarity, we summarize the major steps of the naive Taylor model method as algorithm 1.



2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Eggers ◽  
Martin Fränzle ◽  
Christian Herde ◽  
Theodore E. Simos ◽  
George Psihoyios ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document