uniform congruence
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

3
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (753) ◽  
pp. 89-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Magee ◽  
Hee Oh ◽  
Dale Winter

AbstractLet Γ be a Schottky semigroup in {\mathrm{SL}_{2}(\mathbf{Z})}, and for {q\in\mathbf{N}}, let{\Gamma(q):=\{\gamma\in\Gamma:\gamma=e~{}(\mathrm{mod}~{}q)\}}be its congruence subsemigroup of level q. Let δ denote the Hausdorff dimension of the limit set of Γ. We prove the following uniform congruence counting theorem with respect to the family of Euclidean norm balls {B_{R}} in {M_{2}(\mathbf{R})} of radius R: for all positive integer q with no small prime factors,\#(\Gamma(q)\cap B_{R})=c_{\Gamma}\frac{R^{2\delta}}{\#(\mathrm{SL}_{2}(% \mathbf{Z}/q\mathbf{Z}))}+O(q^{C}R^{2\delta-\epsilon})as {R\to\infty} for some {c_{\Gamma}>0,C>0,\epsilon>0} which are independent of q. Our technique also applies to give a similar counting result for the continued fractions semigroup of {\mathrm{SL}_{2}(\mathbf{Z})}, which arises in the study of Zaremba’s conjecture on continued fractions.


2000 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-239
Author(s):  
Andrew Ensor

Given a variety ν and ν-algebras A and B, an algebraic formationF: A ⇉ B is a ν-homomorphism FL R × A → B, for some ν-algebra R, and the resulting functions F (r,-): A → B for r ∈ R are termed formable. Firstly, as motivation for the study of algebraic formations, categorical formations and their relationship with natural transformations are explained. Then, formations and formable functions are described for some common varieties of algebras, including semilattices, lattices, groups, and implication algebras. Some of their general properties are investigated for congruence modular varieties, including the description of a uniform congruence which provides information on the structure of B.


1980 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Fried ◽  
G. Grätzer ◽  
R. Quackenbush
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document