Bayesian Optimization for Conformer Generation

<p>Generating low-energy molecular conformers is a key task for many areas of computational chemistry, molecular modeling and cheminformatics. Most current conformer generation methods primarily focus on generating geometrically diverse conformers rather than finding the most probable or energetically lowest minima. Here, we present a new stochastic search method called the Bayesian</p><p>Optimization Algorithm (BOA) for finding the lowest energy conformation of a given molecule. We compare BOA with uniform random search, and systematic search as implemented in Confab, to determine which method finds the lowest energy. Energetic difference, root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), and torsion fingerprint deviation (TFD) are used to quantify the performance of the conformer search algorithms. In general, we find BOA requires far fewer evaluations than systematic or uniform random search to find low-energy minima. For molecules with four or more rotatable bonds, Confab typically evaluates 10⁴ (median) conformers in its search, while BOA only requires 10² energy evaluations to find top candidates. Despite using evaluating fewer conformers, 20 − 40% of the time BOA finds lower-energy conformations than a systematic Confab search for molecules with four or more rotatable bonds.</p>

Bayesian Optimization for Conformer Generation

<p>Generating low-energy molecular conformers is a key task for many areas of computational chemistry, molecular modeling and cheminformatics. Most current conformer generation methods primarily focus on generating geometrically diverse conformers rather than finding the most probable or energetically lowest minima. Here, we present a new stochastic search method called the Bayesian</p><p>Optimization Algorithm (BOA) for finding the lowest energy conformation of a given molecule. We compare BOA with uniform random search, and systematic search as implemented in Confab, to determine which method finds the lowest energy. Energetic difference, root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), and torsion fingerprint deviation (TFD) are used to quantify the performance of the conformer search algorithms. In general, we find BOA requires far fewer evaluations than systematic or uniform random search to find low-energy minima. For molecules with four or more rotatable bonds, Confab typically evaluates 10⁴ (median) conformers in its search, while BOA only requires 10² energy evaluations to find top candidates. Despite using evaluating fewer conformers, 20 − 40% of the time BOA finds lower-energy conformations than a systematic Confab search for molecules with four or more rotatable bonds.</p>

Bayesian Optimization for Conformer Generation

<div><div><div><div><p>Generating low-energy molecular conformers is a key task for many areas of computational chemistry, molecular modeling and cheminformatics. Most current conformer generation methods primarily focus on generating geometrically diverse conformers rather than finding the most probable or energetically lowest minima. Here, we present a new stochastic search method using Bayesian Optimization Algorithm (BOA) for finding the lowest energy conformation of a given molecule. We compare BOA with uniform random search, and systematic search as implemented in Confab, to determine which method finds the lowest energy. Energetic difference, root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), and torsion fingerprint deviation (TFD) are used to quantify differences between the conformer search algorithms. In general, we find BOA requires far fewer evaluations than systematic or uniform random search to find low-energy minima. For molecules with four or more rotatable bonds, Confab typically evaluates 104 (median) conformers in its search, while BOA only requires 102 energy evaluations to find top candidates. Despite evaluating fewer conformers, for many molecules, BOA finds lower-energy conformations than an exhaustive systematic Confab search.</p></div></div></div></div>

Bayesian Optimization for Conformer Generation

<div><div><div><div><p>Generating low-energy molecular conformers is a key task for many areas of computational chemistry, molecular modeling and cheminformatics. Most current conformer generation methods primarily focus on generating geometrically diverse conformers rather than finding the most probable or energetically lowest minima. Here, we present a new stochastic search method using Bayesian Optimization Algorithm (BOA) for finding the lowest energy conformation of a given molecule. We compare BOA with uniform random search, and systematic search as implemented in Confab, to determine which method finds the lowest energy. Energetic difference, root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), and torsion fingerprint deviation (TFD) are used to quantify differences between the conformer search algorithms. In general, we find BOA requires far fewer evaluations than systematic or uniform random search to find low-energy minima. For molecules with four or more rotatable bonds, Confab typically evaluates 104 (median) conformers in its search, while BOA only requires 102 energy evaluations to find top candidates. Despite evaluating fewer conformers, for many molecules, BOA finds lower-energy conformations than an exhaustive systematic Confab search.</p></div></div></div></div>

Bayesian Optimization for Conformer Generation

<div><div><div><div><p>Generating low-energy molecular conformers is a key task for many areas of computational chemistry, molecular modeling and cheminformatics. Most current conformer generation methods primarily focus on generating geometrically diverse conformers rather than finding the most probable or energetically lowest minima. Here, we present a new stochastic search method using Bayesian Optimization Algorithm (BOA) for finding the lowest energy conformation of a given molecule. We compare BOA with uniform random search, and systematic search as implemented in Confab, to determine which method finds the lowest energy. Energetic difference, root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), and torsion fingerprint deviation (TFD) are used to quantify differences between the conformer search algorithms. In general, we find BOA requires far fewer evaluations than systematic or uniform random search to find low-energy minima. For molecules with four or more rotatable bonds, Confab typically evaluates 104 (median) conformers in its search, while BOA only requires 102 energy evaluations to find top candidates. Despite evaluating fewer conformers, for many molecules, BOA finds lower-energy conformations than an exhaustive systematic Confab search.</p></div></div></div></div>