The Open Capsular Shift-Latarjet Procedure for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability

Background: Capsular management is having an increasingly important place during the open Latarjet procedure especially in preventing postoperative glenohumeral arthritis. The open capsular shift-Latarjet procedure consists of the classic Latarjet procedure associated with a glenoid T-based capsular shift to treat patients with high risk of recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Indications: Patients presenting with humeral and/or glenoid bone loss, patients practicing professional activities or sports at risk of recurrence and without any previous capsular surgery, or major capsular deficiency. Technique Description: After a classic deltopectoral approach and the osteotomy of the coracoid process, a horizontal split of the subscapularis is performed. Then a glenoid T-based capsulotomy is performed, and 2 passing wire suture threads are passed through the inferior flap of the capsule to prepare the capsular shift. A first, soft, all-sutured anchor is inserted at the inferior part of the glenoid medially to the articular surface. The coracoid graft is then positioned with a first inferior cancellous screw to be flush with the articular surface and fixed using a second cancellous screw. A second anchor is placed laterally and superiorly to the coracoid at the anterior scapular neck. The capsular shift is performed using a passing wire technique to suture the capsular flap to both anchors and to ensure the extraarticular positioning of the coracoid. Results: Bouju et al found a low rate of recurrence with no revision surgeries and a significative lower incidence of osteoarthritis (8.6%) at 10-year follow-up compared with the current literature when suturing the capsule to the coracoid process. Itoigawa et al concluded that suturing the capsule on the coracoid may increase the risk of osteoarthritis due to a direct contact between the humeral head and the transferred coracoid, thus we suggest attaching the capsule over the glenoid. Discussion/Conclusion: With appropriate patient selection, this technique is safe and reliable to treat patients with anterior instability without any specific risk related to the surgery. The association of the capsular repair is an appropriate solution to better restore the anatomy and to prevent the long-term risk of glenohumeral arthritis.

Deviation Analyses of Computer-Assisted, Template-Guided Mandibular Reconstruction With Combined Osteotomy and Reconstruction Pre-Shaped Plate Position Technology: A Comparative Study

BackgroundComputer-assisted and template-guided mandibular reconstruction provides higher accuracy and less variation than conventional freehand surgeries. The combined osteotomy and reconstruction pre-shaped plate position (CORPPP) technique is a reliable choice for mandibular reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CORPPP-guided fibular flap mandibular reconstruction and analyze the possible causes of the deviations.Patients and MethodsFrom June 2015 to December 2016, 28 patients underwent fibular flap mandibular reconstruction. Virtual planning and personalized CORPPP-guided templates were applied in 15 patients while 13 patients received conventional freehand surgeries. Deviations during mandibulectomy and fibular osteotomy, and overall and triaxial deviation of the corresponding mandibular anatomical landmarks were measured by superimposing the pre- and postoperative virtual models.ResultsThe deviation of the resection line and resection angle was 1.23 ± 0.98 mm and 4.11° ± 2.60°. The actual length of fibula segments was longer than the designed length in 7 cases (mean: 0.35 ± 0.32 mm) and shorter in 22 cases (mean: 1.53 ± 1.19 mm). In patients without ramus reconstruction, deviations of the ipsilateral condylar head point (Co.), gonion point (Go.), and coracoid process point (Cor.) were 6.71 ± 3.42 mm, 5.38 ± 1.71 mm, and 11.05 ± 3.24 mm in the freehand group and 1.73 ± 1.13 mm, 1.86 ± 0.96 mm, and 2.54 ± 0.50 mm in the CORPPP group, respectively, with significant statistical differences (p < 0.05). In patients with ramus reconstruction, deviations of ipsilateral Co. and Go. were 9.79 ± 4.74 mm vs. 3.57 ± 1.62 mm (p < 0.05), and 15.17 ± 6.53 mm vs. 4.36 ± 1.68 mm (p < 0.05) in the freehand group and CORPPP group, respectively.ConclusionMandibular reconstructions employing virtual planning and personalized CORPPP-guided templates show significantly higher predictability, convenience, and accuracy of mandibular reconstruction compared with conventional freehand surgeries. However, more clinical cases were required for further dimensional deviation analysis. The application and exploration of clinical practice would also continuously improve the design of templates.

Anatomical Study for the Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fracture Through the Medial Approach

Background: The treatment of complex 3- and 4- part proximal humeral fractures has been controversial due to numerous postoperative complications. With the further study of medial support and blood supply of humeral head, new techniques and conception are developing. The study aims to illustrate the medial approach of the proximal humeral fracture through cadaver autopsy.Method: Upper limbs from 19 cadavers have been dissected to expose the shoulder joint. We selected the coracoid process as the bony reference. Vernier caliper will be used to measure the following data, including distance from coracoid process to circumflex brachial artery, distance between anterior humeral circumflex artery (ACHA) and posterior circumflex brachial artery (PCHA) and their diameters. Assessment included the characteristics of the vascular supply around the humeral head, identification of the structures at risk, quality of exposure of the bony structures, and feasibility of fixation.Results: Medial plate can be easily placed in 86.84% anatomical patterns. An interval of 2 to 3cm (24.29 ± 3.42 mm) was available for internal fixation. ACHA (49.35 ± 8.13 mm, 35.14 - 68.53 mm) and PCHA (49.62 ± 7.82 mm, 37.67 - 66.76 mm) were about 5cm away from the coracoid process. Risk factors including ACHA and PCHA originate in common, PCHA originated from the deep brachial artery (DBA), the presence of perforator vessels; musculocutaneous nerve intersects with ACHA, the diameter of PCHA: ACHA < 1.5. In 13.15% anatomical patterns, this risk factor should be taken seriously. Conclusion: The medial approach opens a new perspective in the optimal management of complex fractures of proximal humerus. Anatomical research proves that the medial approach is feasible. The interval between ACHA and PCHA is suitable for placement. Anatomical pattern and indication have been discussed, and we hypothesized that ACHA has been destroyed in complex PHFs. With further studies on the anatomy and mechanism of injury, the development of more clinical cases will be an important work of our institution in the future.

Coracoid or Clavicle Fractures Associated With Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction is a commonly performed procedure for high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations. Although distal clavicle and coracoid process fractures represent potential complications, they have been described in only case reports and small case series. Purpose: To identify the incidence and characteristics of clavicle and coracoid fractures after CC ligament reconstruction. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The US Military Health System Data Repository was queried for patients with a Current Procedural Terminology code for CC ligament repair or reconstruction between October 2013 and March 2020. The electronic health records, including patient characteristics, radiographs, operative reports, and clinical notes, were evaluated for intraoperative or postoperative clavicle or coracoid fractures. Initial operative technique, fracture management, and subsequent clinical outcomes were reviewed for these patients. Results: A total of 896 primary CC ligament repairs or reconstructions were performed during the study period. There were 21 postoperative fractures and 1 intraoperative fracture in 20 patients. Of these fractures, 12 involved the coracoid and 10 involved the clavicle. The overall incidence of fracture was 3.81 fractures per 1000 person-years. In 5 patients who sustained a fracture, bone tunnels were not drilled in the fractured bone during the index procedure. A total of 17 fractures were ultimately treated operatively, whereas 5 fractures had nonoperative management. Of the 16 active-duty servicemembers who sustained intraoperative or postoperative fractures, 11 were unable to return to full military duty after their fracture care. Conclusion: Fracture of the distal clavicle or coracoid process after CC ligament repair or reconstruction is a rare but serious complication that can occur independent of bone tunnels created during the index procedure. Fractures associated with CC ligament procedures occurred at a rate of 2.46 per 100 cases. Most patients were ultimately treated surgically with open reduction and internal fixation or revision CC ligament reconstruction. Although the majority of patients with intraoperative or postoperative fractures regained full range of motion, complications such as anterior shoulder pain, AC joint asymmetry, and activity-related weakness were common sequelae resulting in physical limitations and separation from military service.