distal clavicle
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

458
(FIVE YEARS 126)

H-INDEX

40
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodorakys Marín Fermín ◽  
Filippo Migliorini ◽  
Emmanuel Papakostas ◽  
Khalid Al-Khelaifi ◽  
David Ricardo Maldonado ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To determine the incidence of concomitant intra-articular glenohumeral injuries in patients undergoing surgical management from distal clavicle fractures (DCF) with shoulder arthroscopy and their impact on outcome. Methods This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and Virtual Health Library databases were accessed in October 2021. All the clinical studies evaluating the surgical management of DCF and using concomitant intra-operatory shoulder arthroscopy were included. Studies that did not specify the concomitant injury type were not eligible. Data from the incidence of intra-articular glenohumeral injuries, injury type, length of the follow-up, and clinical outcomes were retrieved. The quantitative content assessment was performed using the STROBE statement checklist. Evaluation of the publication bias of the included studies was performed using the risk of bias assessment tool for systematic reviews. Results Data from five retrospective and five prospective cohort studies were analyzed. Eight of the included studies were conducted on patient cohorts with Neer type II injuries. Data pooling revealed a mean of 17.70% of concomitant glenohumeral injuries, whereas 84.21% of them required additional surgical management (Table 1). Rotator cuff injuries, labral tears, and biceps pulley lesions were the most common concomitant injuries. Conclusion Preoperative MRI or diagnostic arthroscopy to evaluate glenohumeral associated injuries to DCF should be recommended.


2022 ◽  
pp. 44-50
Author(s):  
Christine C. Piper ◽  
Andrew Neviaser

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Sun ◽  
Ming Cai ◽  
Xiaoming Wu

Abstract Background Os acromiale can be potentially missed or misdiagnosed as acromion fracture, and this can affect treatment determination if it is complicated with an ipsilateral shoulder injury. The clavicle hook plate is a widely used technique for distal clavicle injuries, leading to transacromial erosion, particularly when in the presence of os acromiale. Case presentation A 70-year-old man and a 78-year-old man who had limited mobility and severe pain in their right shoulders following falls attended the emergency center. Both patients were diagnosed with os acromiale with CT or MRI and acute distal clavicle fracture or acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Following a comprehensive evaluation, os acromiale may limit the application of a clavicle hook plate due to potential transacromial erosion. The distal clavicle fracture with ipsilateral os acromiale received treatment with a volar radius locking T plate, and the acromioclavicular joint dislocation with ipsilateral os acromiale was reconstructed using suture anchors. Both yielded satisfactory outcomes and voided transacromial erosion. Conclusions Ipsilateral os acromiale may be a relative contraindication to the clavicle hook plate. An axillary lateral radiograph is recommended to detect potential os acromiale in patients using a hook plate.


2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110533
Author(s):  
Sophie J. Uittenbogaard ◽  
Laurian J.M. van Es ◽  
Chantal den Haan ◽  
Derek F.P. van Deurzen ◽  
Michel P.J. van den Bekerom

Background: As nonoperative treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures is associated with nonunion rates up to 33%, operative treatment is frequently advocated. However, evidence is lacking regarding which operative treatment to perform and whether this is superior to nonoperative treatment in terms of functional outcome and complication rate. Purpose: (1) To evaluate which surgical technique in the treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures is optimal with regard to patient-reported outcomes and union and complication rates. (2) To review nonoperatively treated patients. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis were performed on January 27, 2021, in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL/EBSCO, Web of Science/Clarivate Analytics, and SPORTDiscus/EBSCO. The search included all studies regarding nonoperative and operative treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures with a minimum of 20 patients and follow-up of 12 months. The primary and secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcome measures at 12 months and union, complication, and revision rates. Results: A total of 59 articles were included involving 2284 patients. Coracoclavicular fixation, hook plate, transacromial pins, alternative plate, tension band wire/K-wire, a combination of surgical techniques, and a nonoperative group were described. Hook plates showed lower Constant-Murley scores as compared with coracoclavicular fixation (standard mean difference, –0.77; 95% CI, –1.26 to –0.28; P = .002). However, no significant difference was seen when the hook plate was compared with the locking plate and tension band wire/K-wire groups, and no significant difference in union rate was seen among all operative treatment groups. Operatively treated patients had significantly higher union rates than patients treated nonoperatively (standard mean difference: 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.37; P = .004). Conclusion: Patients treated with hook plates showed significantly lower Constant-Murley scores and higher complication and revision rates as compared with those treated with coracoclavicular fixation, without differences in union rate. Higher Constant-Murley scores were seen in those patients with supplemental coracoclavicular fixation when using locking. Nonoperatively treated patients showed good functional outcome despite the 31% nonunion rate, although future studies are necessary to substantiate this conclusion. When using a locking plate, additional craniocaudal fixation showed significant better functional outcome.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiji Shimpuku ◽  
Yoshiyasu Uchiyama ◽  
Takashi Imai ◽  
Naoki Takatori ◽  
Masahiko Watanabe

Injury ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yin Zhang ◽  
Pei Yu ◽  
Chengyu Zhuang ◽  
Jingfeng Liu ◽  
Gen Li ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shimpei Kurata ◽  
Kazuya Inoue ◽  
Takamasa Shimizu ◽  
Mitsuyuki Nagashima ◽  
Hirakazu Murayama ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The relationship between acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation, corresponding radiological evaluation, and ligament injuries remains controversial. We hypothesized that AC and trapezoid ligament injuries induce AC joint instability, and the clavicle can override the acromion on cross-body adduction view without conoid ligament injury. We aimed to investigate how biomechanically sectioning the AC and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments contributes to AC joint instability in the cross-body adduction position using fresh-frozen cadaver models. Methods Six fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were used in this study, comprising five male and one female specimen, with a mean age of 68.7 (range, 51–87) years). The left side of the trunk and upper limb, and the cervical and thoracic vertebrae and sternum were firmly fixed with an external fixator. The displacement of the distal end of the clavicle relative to the acromion was measured using an electromagnetic tracking device. We simulated AC joint dislocation by sequential resection of AC ligament, AC joint capsule, and CC ligaments in the following order of stages. Stage 0: Intact AC and CC ligaments and acromioclavicular joint capsule; stage 1: Completely sectioned AC ligament and joint disc; stage 2: Sectioned trapezoid ligament; and stage 3: Sectioned conoid ligament. The superior clavicle displacement related to the acromion was measured in the horizontal adduction position, and clavicle overriding on the acromion was assessed radiologically at each stage. Data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc tests. Results Superior displacement was 0.3 mm at stage 1, 6.5 mm at stage 2, and 10.7 mm at stage 3. On the cross-body adduction view, there was no distal clavicle overriding at stages 0 and 1, and distal clavicle overriding was observed in five cases (5/6: 83%) at stage 2 and in six cases (6/6: 100%) at stage 3. Conclusion We found that AC and trapezoid ligament sectioning induced AC joint instability and that the clavicle could override the acromion on cross-body adduction view regardless of conoid ligament sectioning. AC and trapezoid ligament injuries may lead to significant AC joint instability, and the distal clavicle may subsequently override the acromion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document