inferior orbital fissure
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

37
(FIVE YEARS 16)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
pp. 69-74
Author(s):  
Jack Rootman ◽  
Daniel B. Rootman ◽  
Bruce Stewart ◽  
Stefania B. Diniz ◽  
Kelsey A. Roelofs ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Semyon A Melchenko ◽  
Vasiliy A Cherekaev ◽  
Olga Yu Aleshkina ◽  
Gleb V Danilov ◽  
Gerald Musa ◽  
...  

Abstract ObjectivesTo perform an adequate orbito-zygomatic craniotomy, it is very important that the bone cut which passes through the body of the zygoma reaches the inferior orbital fissure (IOF). To reach the IOF, two surface landmarks on the body of the zygoma are described: a point located directly superior to the malar eminence and the zygomaticofacial foramen. The article explores the reliability of these landmarks and three other alternative points to reach the IOF.Method Eighty-three adult skulls were used in this study. The IOF dimensions and the relationship with the malar eminence, the point superior to the malar eminence, the zygomaticofacial foramen and 3 alternative points (E, C, F) were analyzed.Results. The malar eminence was unacceptable for use as a guide to the IOF. The point superior to the malar eminence was also unacceptable as a guide as only 9.4% and 10.9% were in the projection of the IOF on the right and left, respectively. 59.7% of the total zygomaticofacial foramina fell in the IOF projection. The point F fell in the projection of the IOF in 98.8% and 100.0% on the right and left, respectively. Conclusion. The use of the malar eminence as a guide to reach the IOF is unreliable in one third of cases as it is not easily identified intraoperatively in these cases. The zygomaticofacial foramen cannot be considered a reliable surgical landmark to reach the IOF. The authors recommend using the point “F” which is reliable in 98.8-100% of cases.


Head & Neck ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad S. Mahmoud ◽  
Ahmed G. Diab ◽  
Stephany Ngombu ◽  
Daniel M. Prevedello ◽  
Ricardo L. Carrau

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun-Kai Chan ◽  
Sean P. Polster ◽  
Cleiton Formentin ◽  
Arseniy Pichugin ◽  
Georgios Zenonos ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jack Rootman ◽  
Dan B. Rootman ◽  
Bruce Stewart ◽  
Stefânia Diniz ◽  
Kelsey Roelofs ◽  
...  

ORL ro ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (51) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Ruxandra Coroleucă ◽  
Florin Mihail Filipoiu ◽  
Mihaly Enyedi

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (04) ◽  
pp. 333-347
Author(s):  
Laura Salgado-López ◽  
Luciano C.P. Campos-Leonel ◽  
Carlos D. Pinheiro-Neto ◽  
María Peris-Celda

AbstractAdvances in skull base and orbital surgery have led to an increased need to understand the anatomy of the orbit and surrounding structures to safely perform surgeries in this area. The purpose of this article is to review the surrounding anatomy of the orbit from a practical and operative point of view. We describe the orbit from an inferomedial endoscopic endonasal perspective (focusing on its inferior relationship with the maxillary sinus and related structures and its medial relationship with the ethmoid bone), from a posterior and superolateral intracranial perspective (describing the anatomy of the superior orbital fissure, optic canal, inferior orbital fissure, cavernous sinus, orbitofrontal cortex, and surrounding dura) and from an anterior perspective (focusing on the muscles, connective tissue, lateral and medial canthus, and relevant neurovascular anatomy). A deep knowledge of the critical neurovascular and osseous structures surrounding the orbit is necessary for adequately choosing and performing the most favorable orbital approach in every case.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document