plant defense signaling
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

37
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 2219
Author(s):  
Akanksha Gandhi ◽  
Rupesh Kariyat ◽  
Amaravadhi Harikishore ◽  
Marzieh Ayati ◽  
Anirban Bhunia ◽  
...  

Plants and insect herbivores are in a relentless battle to outwit each other. Plants have evolved various strategies to detect herbivores and mount an effective defense system against them. These defenses include physical and structural barriers such as spines, trichomes, cuticle, or chemical compounds, including secondary metabolites such as phenolics and terpenes. Plants perceive herbivory by both mechanical and chemical means. Mechanical sensing can occur through the perception of insect biting, piercing, or chewing, while chemical signaling occurs through the perception of various herbivore-derived compounds such as oral secretions (OS) or regurgitant, insect excreta (frass), or oviposition fluids. Interestingly, ion channels or transporters are the first responders for the perception of these mechanical and chemical cues. These transmembrane pore proteins can play an important role in plant defense through the induction of early signaling components such as plasma transmembrane potential (Vm) fluctuation, intracellular calcium (Ca2+), and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, followed by defense gene expression, and, ultimately, plant defense responses. In recent years, studies on early plant defense signaling in response to herbivory have been gaining momentum with the application of genetically encoded GFP-based sensors for real-time monitoring of early signaling events and genetic tools to manipulate ion channels involved in plant-herbivore interactions. In this review, we provide an update on recent developments and advances on early signaling events in plant-herbivore interactions, with an emphasis on the role of ion channels in early plant defense signaling.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukiyo Yamasaki ◽  
Hiroka Sumioka ◽  
Mayu Takiguchi ◽  
Takuya Uemura ◽  
Yuka Kihara ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 180 (4) ◽  
pp. 2167-2181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Chen ◽  
Wen-Shuai Wang ◽  
Ting Wang ◽  
Xia-Fei Meng ◽  
Ting-ting Chen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (15) ◽  
pp. 7387-7396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng-Jun Zhang ◽  
Jia-Ning Wei ◽  
Chan Zhao ◽  
Ya-Fen Zhang ◽  
Chuan-You Li ◽  
...  

The whitefly Bemisia tabaci is one of the world’s most important invasive crop pests, possibly because it manipulates plant defense signaling. Upon infestation by whiteflies, plants mobilize salicylic acid (SA)-dependent defenses, which mainly target pathogens. In contrast, jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent defenses are gradually suppressed in whitefly-infested plants. The down-regulation of JA defenses make plants more susceptible to insects, including whiteflies. Here, we report that this host–plant manipulation extends to neighboring plants via airborne signals. Plants respond to insect attack with the release of a blend of inducible volatiles. Perception of these volatiles by neighboring plants usually primes them to prepare for an imminent attack. Here, however, we show that whitefly-induced tomato plant volatiles prime SA-dependent defenses and suppress JA-dependent defenses, thus rendering neighboring tomato plants more susceptible to whiteflies. Experiments with volatiles from caterpillar-damaged and pathogen-infected plants, as well as with synthetic volatiles, confirm that whiteflies modify the quality of neighboring plants for their offspring via whitefly-inducible plant volatiles.


Author(s):  
Sudisha Jogaiah ◽  
Sharathchandra Ramasandra Govind ◽  
Huntrike Shekar Shetty

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie de Vries ◽  
Jan de Vries ◽  
Janina K. von Dahlen ◽  
Sven B. Gould ◽  
John M. Archibald ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document