forefoot reconstruction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

46
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Daniel N. Bianco Adames ◽  
Gemma González-Lucena ◽  
Juan I. Stacey Ruales ◽  
Berta Gasol Cudos ◽  
Albert Ginés-Cespedosa

Microsurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Guillier ◽  
Corrado Campisi ◽  
Swen M. Krähenbühl ◽  
Wassim Raffoul ◽  
Pietro G. di Summa

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0003
Author(s):  
Devon Nixon ◽  
Richard McKean ◽  
Sandra Klein ◽  
Jeffrey Johnson ◽  
Jeremy J. McCormick

Category: Lesser Toes, Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Residual pain and recurrent deformity following forefoot surgery can cause significant disability. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis with lesser metatarsal head resection – often referred to as a rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction – has been shown to be a reliable operation for pain relief and deformity correction. Limited data, however, has been published on outcomes of the same forefoot reconstruction operation in the non- rheumatoid patient. Here, we review our experience with this procedure in patients without rheumatoid disease, hypothesizing improved clinical and radiographic outcomes following surgery. Methods: Following chart review and surveying billing codes, we retrospectively identified patients from 2007-2015 without a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis who underwent first MTP arthrodesis with lesser metatarsal head resection (rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction). Phone surveys were then conducted to assess clinical outcomes including pain and satisfaction scores. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were reviewed for 1, 2 intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle (HVA), 2nd MTP angle (MTP-2), and lesser MTP alignment (in both sagittal and axial planes). Postoperative radiographs were also assessed for radiographic union. Results: We identified 14 non-rheumatoid patients (16 feet) who underwent forefoot reconstruction – of those, 13 patients (15 feet) were successfully contacted via follow-up phone survey. Mean postoperative follow up was 42.3 (range: 12-76) months from surgery to phone interview. Mean postoperative satisfaction scores were 9.1 (out of 10), and no patients required further surgery after forefoot reconstruction. Pain scores significantly decreased from 6.2 preoperatively to 2.0 postoperatively (P<.001). Radiographic parameters (IMA, HVA, MTP-2, and lesser MTP alignment in the sagittal plane) all improved with surgery (P<.05). All 16 feet achieved union of the first MTP arthrodesis. Conclusion: With decreased pain, high satisfaction rates, and improved radiographic parameters, first MTP arthrodesis coupled with metatarsal head resection (rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction) is a viable surgical option for non-rheumatoid patients who have failed prior attempts at forefoot reconstruction or have chronic forefoot pain with deformity.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 605-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devon C. Nixon ◽  
Richard M. McKean ◽  
Sandra E. Klein ◽  
Jeffrey E. Johnson ◽  
Jeremy J. McCormick

Background: Recurrent pain and deformity following forefoot surgery can cause significant patient disability. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis with lesser metatarsal head resections—termed the rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction—has been shown to be a reliable operation for pain relief and deformity correction. Limited data, however, have been published on outcomes of the same forefoot reconstruction operation in the nonrheumatoid patient. Here, we describe our experience with this procedure in patients without rheumatoid disease, hypothesizing improved clinical and radiographic outcomes following surgery. Methods: Following chart review and reviewing billing codes, we retrospectively identified patients without a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis who underwent first MTP arthrodesis with lesser metatarsal head resections. Phone surveys were conducted to assess clinical outcomes including pain and patient satisfaction. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were reviewed for 1, 2 intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle (HVA), second MTP angle (MTP-2), and lesser MTP alignment (in both sagittal and axial planes). Postoperative radiographs were assessed for radiographic union. We identified 14 nonrheumatoid patients (16 feet) who underwent forefoot reconstruction. Of those, 13 patients (15 feet) were successfully contacted via follow-up phone survey at an average of 44.3 months postoperatively (range: 20-76 months). Results: Mean postoperative satisfaction scores were 9.0 (out of 10). No patients required reoperation at final phone follow-up. Pain scores significantly decreased from 6.2 preoperatively to 1.9 postoperatively ( P <.001). Radiographic parameters (1,2 IMA, HVA, MTP-2, and lesser MTP alignment in the sagittal plane) improved with surgery ( P <.05), and all 16 feet achieved union of the first MTP arthrodesis. Conclusion: With decreased pain, high satisfaction rates, and improved radiographic parameters, first MTP arthrodesis coupled with lesser metatarsal head resection was a viable option for nonrheumatoid patients who failed prior attempts at forefoot reconstruction or have chronic forefoot pain with deformity. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document