domination game
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

46
(FIVE YEARS 21)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. 103467
Author(s):  
Csilla Bujtás ◽  
Vesna Iršič ◽  
Sandi Klavžar
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Csilla Bujtás ◽  
Vesna Iršič ◽  
Sandi Klavžar ◽  
Kexiang Xu
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Boštjan Brešar ◽  
Michael A. Henning ◽  
Sandi Klavžar ◽  
Douglas F. Rall

Author(s):  
Boštjan Brešar ◽  
Michael A. Henning ◽  
Sandi Klavžar ◽  
Douglas F. Rall
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-464
Author(s):  
Csilla Bujtás ◽  
Michael A. Henning ◽  
Vesna Iršič ◽  
Sandi Klavžar

The (total) connected domination game on a graph \(G\) is played by two players, Dominator and Staller, according to the standard (total) domination game with the additional requirement that at each stage of the game the selected vertices induce a connected subgraph of \(G\). If Dominator starts the game and both players play optimally, then the number of vertices selected during the game is the (total) connected game domination number (\(\gamma_{\rm tcg}(G)\)) \(\gamma_{\rm cg}(G)\) of \(G\). We show that \(\gamma_{\rm tcg}(G) \in \{\gamma_{\rm cg}(G),\gamma_{\rm cg}(G) + 1,\gamma_{\rm cg}(G) + 2\}\), and consequently define \(G\) as Class \(i\) if \(\gamma_{\rm tcg}(G) = \gamma_{\rm cg} + i\) for \(i \in \{0,1,2\}\). A large family of Class \(0\) graphs is constructed which contains all connected Cartesian product graphs and connected direct product graphs with minumum degree at least \(2\). We show that no tree is Class \(2\) and characterize Class \(1\) trees. We provide an infinite family of Class \(2\) bipartite graphs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 343 (11) ◽  
pp. 112076
Author(s):  
Csilla Bujtás ◽  
Vesna Iršič ◽  
Sandi Klavžar
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Csilla Bujtás ◽  
Vesna Iršič ◽  
Sandi Klavžar ◽  
Kexiang Xu
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 343 (9) ◽  
pp. 111955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Duchêne ◽  
Valentin Gledel ◽  
Aline Parreau ◽  
Gabriel Renault
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 282 ◽  
pp. 96-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentin Gledel ◽  
Michael A. Henning ◽  
Vesna Iršič ◽  
Sandi Klavžar

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chalermpong Worawannotai ◽  
Watcharintorn Ruksasakchai

The domination game is played on a graph by two players, Dominator and Staller, who alternately choose a vertex of G. Dominator aims to finish the game in as few turns as possible while Staller aims to finish the game in as many turns as possible. The game ends when all vertices are dominated. The game domination number, denoted by γ g ( G ) (respectively γ g ′ ( G ) ), is the total number of turns when both players play optimally and when Dominator (respectively Staller) starts the game. In this paper, we study a version of this game where the set of chosen vertices is always independent. This version turns out to be another game known as the competition-independence game. The competition-independence game is played on a graph by two players, Diminisher and Sweller. They take turns in constructing maximal independent set M, where Diminisher tries to minimize | M | and Sweller tries to maximize | M | . Note that, actually, it is the domination game in which the set of played vertices is independent. The competition-independence number, denoted by I d ( G ) (respectively I s ( G ) ) is the optimal size of the final independent set in the competition-independence game if Diminisher (respectively Sweller) starts the game. In this paper, we check whether some well-known results in the domination game hold for the competition-independence game. We compare the competition-independence numbers to the game domination numbers. Moreover, we provide a family of graphs such that many parameters are equal. Finally, we present a realization result on the competition-independence numbers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document