Pricing Basket Weather Derivatives on Rainfall and Temperature Processes

This paper follows an incomplete market pricing approach to analyze the evaluation of weather derivatives and the viability of a weather derivatives market in terms of hedging. A utility indifference method is developed for the specification of indifference prices for the seller and buyer of a basket of weather derivatives written on rainfall and temperature. The agent’s risk preference is described by an exponential utility function and the prices are derived by dynamic programming principles and corresponding Hamilton Jacobi-Bellman equations from the stochastic optimal control problems. It is found the indifference measure is equal to the physical measure as there is no correlation between the capital market and weather. The fair price of the derivative should be greater than the seller’s indifference price and less than the buyer’s indifference price for market viability and no arbitrage opportunities.

IRREVERSIBLE INVESTMENTS AND AMBIGUITY AVERSION

Real option valuation has traditionally been concerned with investment under project value uncertainty while assuming that the agent has perfect confidence in a specific model. However, agents do not generally have perfect confidence in their model and this ambiguity may affect their decisions. In addition, the value of real investments is not typically fully spanned by tradable assets because markets are incomplete as is typically the case in energy and commodities. In this paper, we account for the agent’s aversion to model ambiguity and address market incompleteness through the notion of robust indifference prices. We derive analytical results for the perpetual option to invest and the linear complementarity problem that the finite-time version of this problem satisfies. Ambiguity aversion has a number of effects on decision making some of which cannot be explained by altering the agent’s risk aversion. For example, ambiguity averse agents are found to exercise real options both earlier and later than their ambiguity neutral counterparts, depending on whether ambiguity stems from uncertainty in the dynamics of the project value or the dynamics of a hedging asset.