Sagittal adjusting screws for the correction of grade IV spondylolisthesis in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: illustrative case

BACKGROUND Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) and its connective tissue laxity often result in high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. Patients present with debilitating symptoms and neurological deficits. Reports of surgical techniques in non-EDS patients for the treatment of high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis mainly described an open approach, multilevel fusions, and multiple stages with different circumferential approaches. Sagittal adjusting screws (SASs) can be used in a minimally invasive (MI) fashion, allowing intraoperative reduction. OBSERVATIONS A 17-year-old female with EDS presented to the authors’ institute with severe lower back and left L5 radicular pain in 2017. She presented with a left foot drop and difficulty ambulating. Magnetic resonance imaging showed grade IV L5–S1 spondylolisthesis. She underwent lumbar fusion for intractable back pain with radiculopathy. Intraoperatively, percutaneous SASs and extension towers were used to distract the L5–S1 disc space and reduce the spondylolisthesis. MI transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion was completed with significant symptomatic relief postoperatively. The patient was discharged to home 3 days postoperatively. Routine follow-up visits up to 3 years later demonstrated solid fusion radiographically and favorable patient-reported outcomes. LESSONS The authors used SASs in a MI approach to successfully correct and stabilize grade IV spondylolisthesis in an EDS patient with a favorable long-term patient-reported outcome.

Direct reduction of high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis with anterior cantilever technique - surgical technique note and preliminary results

Backgrounds Surgical reduction for high-grade spondylolisthesis is beneficial for restoring sagittal balance and improving the biomechanical environment for arthrodesis. Compared to posterior total laminectomy and long instrumentation, anterior lumbar inter-body fusion (ALIF) is less invasive and has the biomechanical advantage of restoring the original disk height and increasing lumbar lordosis, thus improving sagittal balance. However, the application of ALIF is still limited in treating low-grade spondylolisthesis. In this study, we developed a new technique termed anterior cantilever procedure to directly reduce the slippage of high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. The purpose of our study was to investigate the surgical outcomes of the anterior cantilever procedure followed by ALIF and posterior mono-segment instrumented fixation in high-grade spondylolisthesis. Methods All patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis who underwent anterior cantilever procedure followed by anterior lumbar inter-body fusion (ALIF) and posterior mono-segment instrumented fixation between November 2006 and July 2017 were enrolled in our study. The slip percentage, Dubousset’s lumbosacral angle, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, and sagittal alignment were measured pre-operatively and postoperatively at the last follow-up. Surgery time, blood loss, complications, and hospital stay were also collected and analysed. Results A total of 11 consecutive patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis patients were included and analysed. All of the high-grade spondylolisthesis in our series occurred at the L5-S1 level. The median age was 37 years, and the median follow-up duration was 36 months. The average slip reduction was 30% (60 to 30%, P < 0.01), and the average correction of Dubousset’s lumbosacral angle was 13.8° (84.1° to 97.9°, P < 0.01). The median intra-operative blood loss was 300 mL. All patients attained improved sagittal balance after the operation and achieved solid fusion within 9 months after surgery. No incidences of implant failure, permanent neurological deficit, or pseudarthrosis were recorded at the last follow-up. Conclusions Anterior cantilever procedure followed by ALIF and posterior mono-segment instrumented fixation is a valid procedure for treating high-grade spondylolisthesis. It achieved a high fusion rate, partially reduced slippage, and significantly improved lumbosacral angle, while minimizing common complications, such as pseudarthrosis, nerve traction injury, excessive soft tissue dissection, and blood loss in posterior reduction procedures. However, posterior instrumentation is still required to the structural stability in the ALIF procedure. Level of evidence IV

Curve Characteristics and Response of Sciatic and Olisthesis Scoliosis Following L5/S1 Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adolescent Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND Lumbosacral spondylolisthesis-induced scoliosis is a rare clinical entity. Sagittal reconstruction and the coronal curve evolution after surgery for spondylolisthesis have not been investigated in depth. OBJECTIVE To compare the curve characteristics between sciatic scoliosis and olisthetic scoliosis and to further investigate the effects of lumbosacral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) on scoliosis evolution. METHODS Adolescents with sciatic scoliosis group (SS group) or olisthetic scoliosis group (OS group) who underwent L5/S1 TLIF from 2010 to 2017 and were followed up for at least 2 yr were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS There were 20 patients in the SS group (M/F: 8/12; age: 15.6 ± 2.2 yr) and 16 in the OS group (M/F: 6/10; age: 16.8 ± 2.5 yr). Both groups had similar preoperative Cobb angles, but more patients with coronal imbalance were observed in the SS group. Moreover, the OS group showed significantly larger L5 tilt and rotation. After surgery, the slip reduction rate of the SS group and OS group were 76.1% ± 12.4% and 79.4% ± 9.6%, respectively. Scoliosis resolution was observed in all patients in the SS group but only in 9 patients (56.2%) in the OS group. Patients with failed scoliosis resolution in the OS group were older and had a larger Cobb angle and L5 rotation compared with those with successful scoliosis resolution. CONCLUSION Lumbosacral TLIF can achieve satisfactory slip reduction and scoliosis resolution. Sciatic scoliosis often presents with coronal imbalance but also a preferable curve prognosis. A large Cobb angle and L5 rotation may hinder the resolution of olisthetic scoliosis.