Finitely Supported Binary Relations between Infinite Atomic Sets

In the framework of finitely supported atomic sets, by using the notion of atomic cardinality and the T-finite support principle (a closure property for supports in some higher-order constructions), we present some finiteness properties of the finitely supported binary relations between infinite atomic sets. Of particular interest are finitely supported Dedekind-finite sets because they do not contain finitely supported, countably infinite subsets. We prove that the infinite sets ℘fs(Ak×Al), ℘fs(Ak×℘m(A)), ℘fs(℘n(A)×Ak) and ℘fs(℘n(A)×℘m(A)) do not contain uniformly supported infinite subsets. Moreover, the functions space ZAm does not contain a uniformly supported infinite subset whenever Z does not contain a uniformly supported infinite subset. All these sets are Dedekind-finite in the framework of finitely supported structures.

ON SEPARABILITY FINITENESS CONDITIONS IN SEMIGROUPS

Taking residual finiteness as a starting point, we consider three related finiteness properties: weak subsemigroup separability, strong subsemigroup separability and complete separability. We investigate whether each of these properties is inherited by Schützenberger groups. The main result of this paper states that for a finitely generated commutative semigroup S, these three separability conditions coincide and are equivalent to every $\mathcal {H}$ -class of S being finite. We also provide examples to show that these properties in general differ for commutative semigroups and finitely generated semigroups. For a semigroup with finitely many $\mathcal {H}$ -classes, we investigate whether it has one of these properties if and only if all its Schützenberger groups have the property.

Finiteness properties of the category of mod p representations of

We establish the Bernstein-centre type of results for the category of mod p representations of $\operatorname {\mathrm {GL}}_2 (\mathbb {Q}_p)$ . We treat all the remaining open cases, which occur when p is $2$ or $3$ . Our arguments carry over for all primes p. This allows us to remove the restrictions on the residual representation at p in Lue Pan’s recent proof of the Fontaine–Mazur conjecture for Hodge–Tate representations of $\operatorname {\mathrm {Gal}}(\overline {\mathbb Q}/\mathbb {Q})$ with equal Hodge–Tate weights.