predator switching
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

24
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 109584
Author(s):  
Jin-Shan Wang ◽  
Yong-Ping Wu ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Gui-Quan Sun


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 180339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross N. Cuthbert ◽  
James W. E. Dickey ◽  
Clare McMorrow ◽  
Ciaran Laverty ◽  
Jaimie T. A. Dick

Invasive species continue to severely impact biodiversity, yet predicting the success or failure of introduced species has remained elusive. In particular, the relationship between community invasibility and native species diversity remains obscure. Here, we apply two traditional ecological concepts that inform prey population stability and hence invasibility. We first show that the native predatory crustacean Gammarus duebeni celticus exhibited similar type II (destabilizing) functional responses (FRs) towards native mayfly prey and invasive amphipod prey, when these prey species were presented separately. However, when the two prey species were presented simultaneously, the predator did not exhibit prey switching, instead consuming disproportionately more native prey than expected from the relative abundance of native and invasive species. These consumptive propensities foster reductions of native prey, while simultaneously limiting biotic resistance against the invasive species by the native predator. Since our theoretical considerations and laboratory results match known field invasion patterns, we advocate the increased consideration of FR and prey switching studies to understand and predict the success of invasive species.



2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (12) ◽  
pp. 2851-2857 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Amin Jalali ◽  
M Reza Mehrnejad ◽  
Peter C Ellsworth ◽  
Fateme Ranjbar ◽  
Mahdi Ziaaddini




2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 20170129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadin Graf ◽  
Roman Bucher ◽  
Ralf B. Schäfer ◽  
Martin H. Entling

Subsidies from adjacent ecosystems can alter recipient food webs and ecosystem functions, such as herbivory. Emerging aquatic insects from streams can be an important prey in the riparian zone. Such aquatic subsidies can enhance predator abundances or cause predators to switch prey, depending on the herbivores. This can lead to an increase or decrease of in situ herbivores and herbivory. We examined the effects of aquatic subsidies on a simplified terrestrial food web consisting of two types of herbivores, plants and predators (spiders). In our six-week experiment, we focused on the prey choice of the spiders by excluding predator immigration and reproduction. In accordance with predator switching, survival of leafhoppers increased in the presence of aquatic subsidies. By contrast, the presence of aquatic subsidies indirectly reduced weevils and herbivory. Our study shows that effects of aquatic subsidies on terrestrial predators can propagate through the food web in contrasting ways. Thereby, the outcome of the trophic cascade is determined by the prey choice of predators.



2016 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. 1650043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilesh Kumar Thakur ◽  
S. K. Tiwari ◽  
Ranjit Kumar Upadhyay

In this paper, we have investigated a model with three interacting species: non-toxic phytoplankton, toxic phytoplankton and zooplankton with Holling type II and III functional responses over the space and time. The role of toxin producing phytoplankton (TPP) has been studied. We have presented the theoretical analysis of pattern formation in spatially distributed population with local diffusion. The paper highlights the heterogeneity of HABs over space and time. The choice of parameter values and the functional response is important to study the effect of TPP, also it would depend more on the nonlinearity of the system. With the help of numerical simulations, we have observed the spatial and spatiotemporal patterns for plankton system. This study demonstrates that TPP plays an important role in controlling the dynamics. We have observed that prey’s anti-predator efforts promote predator switching. It has been found that high predation of TPP helps for the coexistence of toxic, non-toxic phytoplankton and zooplankton population.



2014 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 58-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil Pal ◽  
Sudip Samanta ◽  
Joydev Chattopadhyay
Keyword(s):  




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document