paternity probability
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2000 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 189-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiyoshi Tamura ◽  
Hiroko Tsuji ◽  
Tokiko Miyazaki ◽  
Misa Iwata ◽  
Hajime Nishio ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.W. Lee ◽  
H.-S. Lee ◽  
M. Park ◽  
J.-J. Hwang

1999 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiu-Lin Huang ◽  
Keiji Tamaki ◽  
Toshimichi Yamamoto ◽  
Takashi Yoshimoto ◽  
Masaki Mizutani ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-262
Author(s):  
Michael Krawczak ◽  
Jörg Schmidtke ◽  
Jörg T Epplen ◽  
Ingo Hansmann ◽  
Ulrike Thies

An unusual case of paternity testing is reported in which determination of paternity was an essential part of a genetic diagnosis. A.Y-chromosomal abnormality, observed in a 33-year-old male whose wife had experienced a series of spontaneous abortions, was not found in his alleged father. DNA fingerprinting with the oligonucleotide multilocus probe (CAC)5 yielded two aberrant bands for the proband, i.e. bands exhibited by neither parent. This finding resulted in a comparatively low paternity probability of 0.02934 which is suggestive of, but does not unequivocally prove, false paternity. Subsequent analysis with other multi- and single-locus systems, however, failed to confirm this preliminary result. The paternity probability computed on the basis of the single-locus systems was 0.99997, providing compelling evidence in favour of true paternity. The present case thus demonstrates that even when two mutations turn up in a DNA fingerprint, these may be readily recognized as such.


1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 251-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Buss ◽  
Randy J. Larsen ◽  
Drew Westen ◽  
Jennifer Semmelroth

In species with internal female fertilization, males risk both lowered paternity probability and investment in rival gametes if their mates have sexual contact with other males. Females of such species do not risk lowered maternity probability through partner infidelity, but they do risk the diversion of their mates' commitment and resources to rival females. Three studies tested the hypothesis that sex differences in jealousy emerged in humans as solutions to the respective adaptive problems faced by each sex. In Study 1, men and women selected which event would upset them more—a partner's sexual infidelity or emotional infidelity. Study 2 recorded physiological responses (heart rate, electrodermal response, corrugator supercilii contraction) while subjects imagined separately the two types of partner infidelity. Study 3 tested the effect of being in a committed sexual relationship on the activation of jealousy. All studies showed large sex differences, confirming hypothesized sex linkages in jealousy activation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document