shafranov shift
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

29
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 124002 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. McClenaghan ◽  
A.M. Garofalo ◽  
G.M. Staebler ◽  
S.Y. Ding ◽  
X. Gong ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Loizu ◽  
S. R. Hudson ◽  
C. Nührenberg ◽  
J. Geiger ◽  
P. Helander

A numerical investigation is carried out to understand the equilibrium $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$-limit in a classical stellarator. The stepped-pressure equilibrium code (Hudson et al., Phys. Plasmas, vol. 19 (11), 2012) is used in order to assess whether or not magnetic islands and stochastic field-lines can emerge at high $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$. Two modes of operation are considered: a zero-net-current stellarator and a fixed-iota stellarator. Despite the fact that relaxation is allowed (Taylor, Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 58 (3), 1986, pp. 741–763), the former is shown to maintain good flux surfaces up to the equilibrium $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$-limit predicted by ideal-magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), above which a separatrix forms. The latter, which has no ideal equilibrium $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$-limit, is shown to develop regions of magnetic islands and chaos at sufficiently high $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$, thereby providing a ‘non-ideal $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$-limit’. Perhaps surprisingly, however, the value of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ at which the Shafranov shift of the axis reaches a fraction of the minor radius follows in all cases the scaling laws predicted by ideal-MHD. We compare our results to the High-Beta-Stellarator theory of Freidberg (Ideal MHD, 2014, Cambridge University Press) and derive a new prediction for the non-ideal equilibrium $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$-limit above which chaos emerges.


2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (12) ◽  
pp. 125015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Ball ◽  
Felix I Parra ◽  
Jungpyo Lee ◽  
Antoine J Cerfon

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. Xie ◽  
Y. Xiao ◽  
I. Holod ◽  
Z. Lin ◽  
E. A. Belli

Global, first-principles study of the kinetic ballooning mode (KBM) is crucial to understand tokamak edge physics in high-confinement mode (H-mode). In contrast to the ion temperature gradient mode and trapped electron mode, the KBM is found to be very sensitive to the equilibrium implementations in gyrokinetic codes. In this paper, we show that a second-order difference in Shafranov shift or geometric coordinates, or a difference between local and global profile implementations can bring a factor of two or more discrepancy in real frequency and growth rate. This suggests that an accurate global equilibrium is required for validation of gyrokinetic KBM simulations.


2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-301
Author(s):  
Jaewoong CHOI ◽  
Hyung-seok CHOI ◽  
Ohjin KWON*

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document