product matching
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

22
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Ketki Gupte ◽  
Linsey Pang ◽  
Harshada Vuyyuri ◽  
Sujitha Pasumarty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Foxcroft ◽  
Tianle Chen ◽  
Kanchana Padmanabhan ◽  
Brian Keng ◽  
Luiza Antonie

Author(s):  
Szymon Łukasik ◽  
Andrzej Michałowski ◽  
Piotr A. Kowalski ◽  
Amir H. Gandomi
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 3-13
Author(s):  
Lei Huang ◽  
Wei Shao ◽  
Fuzhou Wang ◽  
Weidun Xie ◽  
Ka-Chun Wong

Author(s):  
Harni Kusniyati ◽  
Arie Aditya Nugraha

Consumers today have the option to purchase products from thousands of e-commerce. However, the completeness of the product specifications and taxonomies used to organize products differently in different electronic shop differently. To improve the consumer experience, Pricebook approach for integration of the product through the website to find the cheapest price from various platforms. In our writing, we do approach by using a model of neural language such as TF-IDF (term frequency-inverse document frequency) as well as Word2vec by using the method of cosine similarity. TF-IDF is a way to give the relationship a word weighting (term) against the document. Semantic vector or word embedding is one way to represent the structure of a sentence will be in align with manipulating sentences into vector shapes with Word2Vec. Cosine similarity method is a method to calculate the similarity between two objects that is expressed in two vectors by using keywords (keywords) of a document as the size so that it leads to more products matching good performance and categorization. In addition, we compare the results of the representation of the TF-IDF with Word2vec against a number of the data.


Author(s):  
Yantao Shen ◽  
Tong Xiao ◽  
Shuai Yi ◽  
Dapeng Chen ◽  
Xiaogang Wang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 61-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyliss Jia Gai ◽  
Anne-Kathrin Klesse

Companies frequently offer product recommendations to customers, according to various algorithms. This research explores how companies should frame the methods they use to derive their recommendations, in an attempt to maximize click-through rates. Two common framings—user-based and item-based—might describe the same recommendation. User-based framing emphasizes the similarity between customers (e.g., “People who like this also like…”); item-based framing instead emphasizes similarities between products (e.g., “Similar to this item”). Six experiments, including two field experiments within a mobile app, show that framing the same recommendation as user-based (vs. item-based) can increase recommendation click-through rates. The findings suggest that user-based (vs. item-based) framing informs customers that the recommendation is based on not just product matching but also taste matching with other customers. Three theoretically derived and practically relevant boundary conditions related to the recommendation recipient, the products, and other users also offer practical guidance for managers regarding how to leverage recommendation framings to increase recommendation click-throughs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Li ◽  
Zhicheng Dou ◽  
Yutao Zhu ◽  
Xiaochen Zuo ◽  
Ji-Rong Wen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document