beam commissioning
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

109
(FIVE YEARS 28)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (06) ◽  
pp. P06037
Author(s):  
Z. Wang ◽  
W.L. Xia ◽  
Y.R. Lu ◽  
K. Zhu ◽  
S.L. Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Mai Yotsuzuka ◽  
Toru Iijima ◽  
Hiromi Iinuma ◽  
Kenji Inami ◽  
Masashi Otani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Masanori Ikegami ◽  
Hiroyuki Ao ◽  
Jon Bonofiglio ◽  
Nathan Bultman ◽  
Fabio Casagrande ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. T12011-T12011
Author(s):  
M. Di Giacomo ◽  
R. Ferdinand ◽  
B. Jacquot ◽  
J-M. Lagniel ◽  
X. Ledoux ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Geon Choi ◽  
Martin Law ◽  
Do-Kun Yoon ◽  
Mikoto Tamura ◽  
Kenji Matsumoto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background An O-ring gantry-type linear accelerator (LINAC) with a 6-MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam, Halcyon, includes a reference beam that contains representative information such as the percent depth dose, profile and output factor for commissioning and quality assurance. However, because it does not provide information about the field size, we proposed a method to determine all field sizes according to all depths for radiation therapy using simplified sigmoidal curve fitting (SCF). Methods After mathematical definition of the SCF using four coefficients, the defined curves were fitted to both the reference data (RD) and the measured data (MD). For good agreement between the fitting curve and the profiles in each data set, the field sizes were determined by identifying the maximum point along the third derivative of the fitting curve. The curve fitting included the field sizes for beam profiles of 2 × 2, 4 × 4, 6 × 6, 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 20 × 20 and 28 × 28 cm2 as a function of depth (at 1.3, 5, 10 and 20 cm). The field size results from the RD were compared with the results from the MD using the same condition. Results All fitting curves show goodness of fit, R2, values that are greater than 0.99. The differences in field size between the RD and the MD were within the range of 0 to 0.2 cm. The smallest difference in the field sizes at a depth of 10 cm, which is a surface-to-axis distance, was reported. Conclusion Application of the SCF method has been proven to accurately capture the field size of the preconfigured RD and the measured FFF photon beam data for the Halcyon system. The current work can be useful for beam commissioning as a countercheck methodology to determine the field size from RD in the treatment planning system of a newly installed Halcyon system and for routine quality assurance to ascertain the correctness of field sizes for clinical use of the Halcyon system.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Geon Choi ◽  
Martin Law ◽  
Do-Kun Yoon ◽  
Mikoto Tamura ◽  
Kenji Matsumoto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : An O-ring gantry-type linear accelerator (Linac) with a 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam, Halcyon, includes a reference beam containing the representative information regarding the percent depth dose, profile, output factor, etc. for commissioning and quality assurance. However, because it does not provide the information of the field size, we proposed a method to determine all field sizes according to all depths for radiation therapy using simplified sigmoidal curve fitting (SCF). Methods : After a mathematical definition of the SCF using four coefficients, the defined curves were fitted to both the reference and measured data. For a high agreement between the fitting curve and the profiles in each data set, the field sizes were determined by identifying the maximum point along the third derivative of the fitting curve. The curve fitting included the field sizes for beam profiles of 2 × 2, 4 × 4, 6 × 6, 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 20 × 20 and 28 × 28 cm 2 as a function of depth (at 1.3, 5, 10, 20 cm). The results of the field size from the reference data were compared with the results in the measured data using the same condition. Results : All fitting curves show values of goodness of fit, R 2 , better than 0.99. The differences in the field size between the reference data and the measured data were within the range of 0 to 0.2 cm. The lowest difference in the field sizes at a depth of 10 cm, which is a surface-to-axis distance, was reported. Conclusion : The application of the SCF has been proven to accurately obtain the field size of the preconfigured reference and of the measured FFF photon beam data for the Halcyon system. The current work can be useful for beam commissioning as a counte-rcheck methodology to determine the field size from the reference data in the treatment planning system of a newly installed Halcyon system and for the routine quality assurance to ascertain the correctness of field sizes clinically used with the Halcyon system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document