Acoustic black hole in 2 + 1 dimensions as a particle accelerator

In this paper, we have studied particle collision around a rotating acoustic black hole in 2 + 1 dimensions. This black hole is analog to a fluid flow in a draining bath tub with a sink. Center of mass energy for two-particle collision at the horizon of the rotating acoustic black hole is considered. There is a possibility of the two-mass collision to create infinite center of mass energy for certain fine tuning of the parameters of the theory.

Rings which admit elimination of quantifiers

We say that a ring admits elimination of quantifiers, if in the language of rings, {0, 1, +, ·}, the complete theory of R admits elimination of quantifiers.Theorem 1. Let D be a division ring. Then D admits elimination of quantifiers if and only if D is an algebraically closed or finite field.A ring is prime if it satisfies the sentence: ∀x∀y∃z (x =0 ∨ y = 0∨ xzy ≠ 0).Theorem 2. If R is a prime ring with an infinite center and R admits elimination of quantifiers, then R is an algebraically closed field.Let be the class of finite fields. Let be the class of 2 × 2 matrix rings over a field with a prime number of elements. Let be the class of rings of the form GF(pn)⊕GF(pk) such that either n = k or g.c.d. (n, k) = 1. Let be the set of ordered pairs (f, Q) where Q is a finite set of primes and such that the characteristic of the ring f(q) is q. Finally, let be the class of rings of the form ⊕q ∈ Qf(q), for some (f, Q) in .Theorem 3. Let R be a finite ring without nonzero trivial ideals. Then R admits elimination of quantifiers if and only if R belongs to.Theorem 4. Let R be a ring with the descending chain condition of left ideals and without nonzero trivial ideals. Then R admits elimination of quantifiers if and only if R is an algebraically closed field or R belongs to.In contrast to Theorems 2 and 4, we haveTheorem 5. If R is an atomless p-ring, then R is finite, commutative, has no nonzero trivial ideals and admits elimination of quantifiers, but is not prime and does not have the descending chain condition.We also generalize Theorems 1, 2 and 4 to alternative rings.