Off label use of PICC as umbilical arterial catheter: Clinical case series

Umbilical arterial catheters are often placed at birth in critical ill neonates. Advantages of umbilical arterial catheterization include continuous blood pressure monitoring, accurate blood gas and frequent blood samplings. We described the off-label use of a third generation polyurethane power injectable 3 Fr single lumen peripheral inserted central catheter as umbilical arterial catheter. This clinical case series opens new scenarios about the off-label use of power PICC in newborns. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the safety and advantages of PICCs as umbilical catheters over the conventional old generation polyurethane neonatal catheters.

Intra- and Inter-Rater Agreement between X-Ray Views for Umbilical Catheter Position

Objective We determined intra- and inter-rater agreement for umbilical arterial/venous catheter (umbilical arterial catheter [UAC] and umbilical venous catheter [UVC], respectively) positions on supine anteroposterior (AP) and horizontal dorsal decubitus (HDD) X-ray views to determine whether two views are routinely required. Study Design This retrospective study was conducted in McMaster University, Canada. Pairs of AP and HDD radiographs were coded and rated in random sequence by two experienced raters. Primary outcome was intra-rater agreement (κ) between AP and HDD views for UVC catheter tip position. Secondary outcomes included inter-rater κ for UVC position; inter- and intra-rater κ for UAC position, inter- and intra-rater κ for follow-up action. To detect κ of 0.8 (width of 95% confidence interval = 0.1), 138 radiograph pairs were required. Results Intra-rater agreement tended to be higher for UVC versus UAC position (Rater#1: κ = 0.44 vs. 0.16, respectively, p = 0.08; and #2: κ = 0.56 vs. 0.47, respectively, p = 0.5). Inter-rater agreement was higher on AP versus HDD view for UVC position (κ = 0.6 vs. 0.29, respectively, p = 0.03) and action recommended for UVC (κ = 0.61 and 0.19, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusion AP is superior to HDD view for UVC.

Accuracy of 11 formulae to guide umbilical arterial catheter tip placement in newborn infants

BackgroundUmbilical arterial catheter (UAC) insertion is a common procedure in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Correct placement of the tip of the UAC at first attempt minimises handling of the infant and reduces the risk of infection and complications. We aimed to determine the accuracy of 11 published formulae to guide UAC placement.MethodsThis was a one-year prospective observational study in a tertiary NICU. Clinicians used their preferred formula for UAC insertion, with X-rays performed immediately post-procedure to check the tip position. Birth weight and measurements included in the 11 formulae were recorded within 48 hours. The gold standard insertion distance was defined as the distance from the abdominal wall to the mid-descending aorta, at T8 level on X-ray (range T6–T10). Insertion length using the 11 formulae was calculated and compared with this gold standard distance.ResultsOne hundred and three infants were included, with median (IQR) gestational age and weight of 28 (26–33.5) weeks and 980 (780–2045) g, respectively. The predicted value of the 11 formulae to place the UAC in correct position ranged from 51.0% to 73.8%. Formulae that involved direct body part measurements showed the highest predicted success rates, smallest mean difference from T8 and narrowest limits of agreement using the Bland-Altman method.ConclusionSuccess rates for accurate UAC placement are highest when formulae that involve body measurements are used. However, even the most accurate method would result in more than 25% of UACs needing manipulation to achieve an optimal position.