distributed bisimulation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

0
(FIVE YEARS 0)

1992 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-397
Author(s):  
Luca Aceto

The noninterleaving equivalences that have been proposed in the literature may be roughly divided into three classes, depending on the kind of observational scenarios underlying them. Some of them distinguish parallelism from nondeterminism by admitting explicit observations of the causal structure of systems; some others are based on the observation of distribution and still others on the assumption that actions have duration. In general, these three observational scenarios give rise to equivalences of incomparable discriminating power. In this paper, we show that three representative equivalences of the aforementioned classes, namely timed equivalence [Hen88], distributed bisimulation [CH89] and causal bisimulation [DD88], coincide over a language for finite parallel processes without communication and restriction. The proof of this result is algebraic in style and relies on a theorem giving a finite, ω-complete axiomatization of causal bisimulation over the language under consideration. We also give a model for our language based upon causal trees and prove that it is fully abstract with respect to the largest congruence contained in strong bisimulation and preserved by a very simple form of action refinement [AH89].


1991 ◽  
Vol 20 (347) ◽  
Author(s):  
Søren Christensen

In this paper we consider the distributed bisimulation equivalence defined by Hennessy and Castellani and later developed by Castellani. We present a logic in the style of Hennessy-Milner logic to charaterize the equivalence, i.e. we seek a logic such that whenever two processes are distributed bisimulation equivalent, they satisfy the same set of formulae and vice versa. Furthermore, for a small subset of CCS we provide a proof system which is shown to be sound and complete. The proof system is structural both in the structure of formulae and in the structure of processes. For the case of parallel composition of processes we present inference rules defined via a new combinator introduced. The combinator in question is left merge, a special kind of parallel composition in which the left operand has precedence over the other and must perform the first action observed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document