Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
Latest Publications

TOTAL DOCUMENTS

(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

(FIVE YEARS 0)

Published By Cambridge University Press

9781107282124

Latest Documents Most Cited Documents Contributed Authors Related Sources Related Keywords

Rebalancing the unbalanced constitution: juridification and national security in the United Kingdom

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review ◽

10.1017/cbo9781107282124.013 ◽

2014 ◽

pp. 209-227

Author(s):

Roger Masterman

Keyword(s):

United Kingdom ◽

National Security ◽

The United Kingdom

Download Full-text

Counter-terrorism law and judicial review: the challenge for the Court of Justice of the European Union

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review ◽

10.1017/cbo9781107282124.017 ◽

2014 ◽

pp. 283-301 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Cian C. Murphy

Keyword(s):

European Union ◽

Judicial Review ◽

The European Union ◽

Counter Terrorism ◽

Court Of Justice

Download Full-text

The politics of counter-terrorism judicial review: creating effective parliamentary scrutiny

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review ◽

10.1017/cbo9781107282124.009 ◽

2014 ◽

pp. 142-160

Author(s):

Fergal F. Davis

Keyword(s):

Judicial Review ◽

Counter Terrorism

Download Full-text

Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial and legislative review

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review ◽

10.1017/cbo9781107282124.011 ◽

2014 ◽

pp. 183-206

Author(s):

Kent Roach

Keyword(s):

Legislative Review

Download Full-text

Independent reviewers as alternative: an empirical study from Australia and the United Kingdom

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review ◽

10.1017/cbo9781107282124.010 ◽

2014 ◽

pp. 161-182 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jessie Blackbourn

Keyword(s):

United Kingdom ◽

Empirical Study ◽

The United Kingdom

Download Full-text

Accountability for counter-terrorism: challenges and potential in the role of the courts

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review ◽

10.1017/cbo9781107282124.019 ◽

2014 ◽

pp. 324-364 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Helen Duffy

Keyword(s):

Counter Terrorism

Download Full-text

Emergency law as administrative law

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review ◽

10.1017/cbo9781107282124.008 ◽

2014 ◽

pp. 121-141

Author(s):

Mark Tushnet

Keyword(s):

Administrative Law

Download Full-text

Post 9/11 UK counter-terrorism cases in the European Court of Human Rights: a ‘dialogic’ approach to rights protection or appeasement of national authorities?

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review ◽

10.1017/cbo9781107282124.018 ◽

2014 ◽

pp. 302-323

Author(s):

Helen Fenwick

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Counter Terrorism ◽

Rights Protection ◽

European Court ◽

Dialogic Approach

Download Full-text

The rhetoric and reality of judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review ◽

10.1017/cbo9781107282124.006 ◽

2014 ◽

pp. 97-118

Author(s):

Jules Lobel

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Judicial Review ◽

The United States ◽

Counter Terrorism ◽

States Experience

Download Full-text

When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of rights-friendly judgments

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review ◽

10.1017/cbo9781107282124.005 ◽

2014 ◽

pp. 75-96

Author(s):

David Jenkins

Keyword(s):

Unintended Consequences

Download Full-text

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial ReviewLatest Publications

TOTAL DOCUMENTS

H-INDEX

Published By Cambridge University Press

Rebalancing the unbalanced constitution: juridification and national security in the United Kingdom

Counter-terrorism law and judicial review: the challenge for the Court of Justice of the European Union

The politics of counter-terrorism judicial review: creating effective parliamentary scrutiny

Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial and legislative review

Independent reviewers as alternative: an empirical study from Australia and the United Kingdom

Accountability for counter-terrorism: challenges and potential in the role of the courts

Emergency law as administrative law

Post 9/11 UK counter-terrorism cases in the European Court of Human Rights: a ‘dialogic’ approach to rights protection or appeasement of national authorities?

The rhetoric and reality of judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience

When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of rights-friendly judgments

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
Latest Publications