Essays in Philosophy
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

614
(FIVE YEARS 17)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Published By Pacific University Library

1526-0569

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Boudou ◽  


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Ball-Blakely ◽  
Keyword(s):  


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany E. Montoya ◽  


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-119
Author(s):  
Susan C. C. Hawthorne ◽  
Ramona C. Ilea ◽  
Monica “Mo” Janzen ◽  

By drawing on a selection of interviews from the website Engaged Philosophy, this paper highlights the work of philosopher-activists within their classrooms and communities. These philosophers have stepped out of the ivory towers and work directly with media, community and political groups, people in prison; or they encourage their students to engage in activist projects. The variety of approaches presented here shows the many ways philosophically inspired activism can give voice to those who are marginalized, shine a light on injustices, expose the root of social problems, and empower others to seek solutions. This work shows the relevance of philosophy to practical problems and the powerful effects it can have in the world.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-108
Author(s):  
R. A. Main ◽  

Against the medical and social models of disability are two newer proposals. Elizabeth Barnes’ Minority Body proposes that it is the bodies which are advocated for and included in the disability rights movement which are rightfully called “disabled.” Savulescu and Kahane’s Welfarist approach proposes that disability is intrinsically tied to the effects of bodily states on welfare. They put the need for a consistent and relatively simple normative theory above accounting for standard case judgements about who is and is not disabled or looking at all to membership of the disabled community. I argue that Barnes’ theory offers the best response to issues with the dominant models of disability. Further, I argue that the Welfarist theory operates in a space removed from the wishes and lived experiences of disabled people – separating ‘disability’ from activism entirely – to its detriment. Doing so compromises its explanatory power, over-generalizes the concept and prevents the insertion of meaningful boundaries. Barnes’ ‘solidarity thesis’ soundly conceptualizes disability whilst making room for activist voices. The centering of activist projects makes it stronger.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-134
Author(s):  
Emily McGill ◽  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document