Gender bias in student evaluation of teaching or a mirage?

In a recent small sample study, Khazan et al. [1] examined SET ratings received by one female teaching (TA) assistant who assisted with teaching two sections of the same online course, one section under her true gender and one section under false/opposite gender. Khazan et al. concluded that their study demonstrated gender bias against female TA even though they found no statistical difference in SET ratings between male vs. female TA (p = 0.73). To claim gender bias, Khazan et al. ignored their overall findings and focused on distribution of six “negative” SET ratings and claimed, without reporting any statistical test results, that (a) female students gave more positive ratings to male TA than female TA, (b) female TA received five times as many negative ratings than the male TA, and (c) female students gave “most low” scores to female TA. We conducted the missing statistical tests and found no evidence supporting Khazan et al.’s claims. We also requested Khazan et al.’s data to formally examine them for outliers and to re-analyze the data with and without the outliers. Khazan et al. refused. We read off the data from their Figure 1 and filled in several values using the brute force, exhaustive search constrained by the summary statistics reported by Khazan et al. Our re-analysis revealed six outliers and no evidence of gender bias. In fact, when the six outliers were removed, the female TA was rated higher than male TA but non-significantly so.

Small samples, unreasonable generalizations, and outliers: Gender bias in student evaluation of teaching or three unhappy students?

In a widely cited and widely talked about study, MacNell et al. (2015) [1] examined SET ratings of one female and one male instructor, each teaching two sections of the same online course, one section under their true gender and the other section under false/opposite gender. MacNell et al. concluded that students rated perceived female instructors more harshly than perceived male instructors, demonstrating gender bias against perceived female instructors. Boring, Ottoboni, and Stark (2016) [2] re-analyzed MacNell et al.’s data and confirmed their conclusions. However, the design of MacNell et al. study is fundamentally flawed. First, MacNell et al.’ section sample sizes were extremely small, ranging from 8 to 12 students. Second, MacNell et al. included only one female and one male instructor. Third, MacNell et al.’s findings depend on three outliers – three unhappy students (all in perceived female conditions) who gave their instructors the lowest possible ratings on all or nearly all SET items. We re-analyzed MacNell et al.’s data with and without the three outliers. Our analyses showed that the gender bias against perceived female instructors disappeared. Instead, students rated the actual female vs. male instructor higher, regardless of perceived gender. MacNell et al.’s study is a real-life demonstration that conclusions based on extremely small sample-sized studies are unwarranted and uninterpretable.

Formation of nickel–iron meteorites by chemical fluid transport

The deposition of solid material from the gas phase via chemical vapor transport (CVT) is a well-known process of industrial and geochemical relevance. There is strong evidence that this type of thermodynamically driven chemical transport reaction plays a significant role in certain natural processes. This article presents detailed evidence that CVT is a highly plausible mechanism for the formation of iron meteorites. In this study, naturally occurring CVT is referred to as “chemical fluid transport” (CFT) and the end products deposited from the gas phase as “fluidites.” Treating iron meteorites as cosmic fluidites enables simple solutions to be found to the problem of how they formed and to numerous related and in some cases unresolved questions. This study is based on a thermodynamic trend analysis of solid–gas equilibrium reactions involving chlorine- and fluorine-containing compounds of 42 chemical elements that include a systematic examination of reaction dominance switching behavior. In order to assess the transport behavior of the individual elements, the reaction-conditioned pressures p MeX were calculated from the equilibrium constants. For a selected group of minerals, the relative propensity of these minerals to deposit from the gas phase was then derived from the equilibrium constants. The study shows that octahedrites, hexahedrites and ataxites formed as a result of the transport of metal chlorides and fluorides (CFT) during accretion within the solar nebula. Siderophile elements are characterized by the similarities in their chemical transport properties. These chemical properties of the elements, expressed in the form of the reaction-conditioned pressure, play a key role in determining the chemical composition of iron meteorites. The mobilization process that leads to the formation of the gaseous metal halides MeX includes the reduction of oxides. The deposition of nickel–iron bodies occurs via back reaction after the transport of the gaseous halides. The back reaction leads to the thermodynamically favored deposition of schreibersite before troilite and of troilite before kamacite/taenite. The deposition temperature of octahedrites and hexahedrites lies below the temperature at which Widmanstätten patterns would be destroyed, while that of ataxites lies slightly above. Similarly, the occurrence of thermally instable cohenite in meteorites provides further support for the fluidite character of irons. The variation in the trace element concentrations in iron meteorites is explained by enrichment and depletion mechanisms in the gas phase. The striking correlation between gallium and germanium abundances in iron meteorites is the result of similarities regarding the mobilization phase and the reaction dominance switching behavior of both elements, and crystal isomorphism. These findings are supported by numerous arguments that provide evidence for the CFT model. The occurrence of the mineral lawrencite FeCl 2 in meteorites is interpreted as an indication of the effectiveness of the chemical transport of FeCl 2 . The presence of meteorite alteration and the observed deviations from the solar elemental abundances in silicate meteorites are also explained in terms of the effectiveness of CFT-based mobilization.

Formation of nickel–iron meteorites by chemical fluid transport

The deposition of solid material from the gas phase via chemical vapor transport (CVT) is a well-known process of industrial and geochemical relevance. There is strong evidence that this type of thermodynamically driven chemical transport reaction plays a significant role in certain natural processes. This article presents detailed evidence that CVT is a highly plausible mechanism for the formation of iron meteorites. In this study, naturally occurring CVT is referred to as “chemical fluid transport” (CFT) and the end products deposited from the gas phase as “fluidites.” Treating iron meteorites as cosmic fluidites enables simple solutions to be found to the problem of how they formed and to numerous related and in some cases unresolved questions. This study is based on a thermodynamic trend analysis of solid–gas equilibrium reactions involving chlorine- and fluorine-containing compounds of 42 chemical elements that include a systematic examination of reaction dominance switching behavior. In order to assess the transport behavior of the individual elements, the reaction-conditioned pressures p MeX were calculated from the equilibrium constants. For a selected group of minerals, the relative propensity of these minerals to deposit from the gas phase was then derived from the equilibrium constants. The study shows that octahedrites, hexahedrites and ataxites formed as a result of the transport of metal chlorides and fluorides (CFT) during accretion within the solar nebula. Siderophile elements are characterized by the similarities in their chemical transport properties. These chemical properties of the elements, expressed in the form of the reaction-conditioned pressure, play a key role in determining the chemical composition of iron meteorites. The mobilization process that leads to the formation of the gaseous metal halides MeX includes the reduction of oxides. The deposition of nickel–iron bodies occurs via back reaction after the transport of the gaseous halides. The back reaction leads to the thermodynamically favored deposition of schreibersite before troilite and of troilite before kamacite/taenite. The deposition temperature of octahedrites and hexahedrites lies below the temperature at which Widmanstätten patterns would be destroyed, while that of ataxites lies slightly above. Similarly, the occurrence of thermally instable cohenite in meteorites provides further support for the fluidite character of irons. The variation in the trace element concentrations in iron meteorites is explained by enrichment and depletion mechanisms in the gas phase. The striking correlation between gallium and germanium abundances in iron meteorites is the result of similarities regarding the mobilization phase and the reaction dominance switching behavior of both elements, and crystal isomorphism. These findings are supported by numerous arguments that provide evidence for the CFT model. The occurrence of the mineral lawrencite FeCl 2 in meteorites is interpreted as an indication of the effectiveness of the chemical transport of FeCl 2 . The presence of meteorite alteration and the observed deviations from the solar elemental abundances in silicate meteorites are also explained in terms of the effectiveness of CFT-based mobilization.