Oculomotor Imbalance in Binocular Vision and Fixation Disparity.

1969 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 450-451
Author(s):  
N. B. Chin
Perception ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 76-76
Author(s):  
W Jaschinski

In binocular vision, fixation disparity is present when a fixation point falls within Panum's area, but not on corresponding retinal points. To investigate the effect of vergence load, fixation disparity was measured at viewing distances of 20, 30, 40, 60, and 100 cm (while the test subtended a constant angular size) by the psychophysical method of dichoptically presented nonius lines with a central fusion stimulus. As the viewing distance was shortened from 100 to 20 cm, mean fixation disparity changed monotonically from 1 min arc esophoria (ie the eyes converged in front of the target) to 3 min arc exophoria. The average standard deviation of the psychometric function, which is a measure of the temporal variability of vergence, was smallest at 100 cm (when fixation disparity was esophoric) and increased at shorter distances. Fixation disparity was also measured at a constant distance of 40 cm, but with prisms in front of the eyes that induced the same vergence angles as would be induced by viewing distances between 20 and 100 cm. The slope of these conventional ‘fixation disparity curves’ as a function of prism load correlated with the slope of fixation disparity as a function of viewing distance ( r=0.39, p=0.02, n=25). However, testing at different distances, as introduced here, has the advantage of preserving the natural interaction between vergence and accommodation. Since the change of fixation disparity with distance differed reliably among subjects (with a test — retest correlation of 0.65 in 34 subjects with good binocular vision) this measure may be useful for identifying subjects who are prone to near-vision complaints.


Author(s):  
Volkhard Schroth ◽  
Olga Prenat ◽  
Natalia Vlasak ◽  
Roger Crelier

Abstract Many things interfere with good binocular vision in nowadays modern digital environment: long periods spent looking at screens and switching between different digital devices at short distances. Vision-related or asthenopic complaints such as headaches, tired and burning eyes or blurred vision can be experienced by many people. Prescribing prismatic correction for fixation disparity can help to reduce these symptoms. A new, highly innovative method for measuring and correcting fixation disparity has been developed - HOYA EyeGenius®. The HOYA EyeGenius® method includes the unique examination procedures, pre-tests and fixation disparity measurements at far and near distances. The pre-tests allow to include patients with asthenopic complaints only with normal binocular vision and exclude cases with abnormal binocular vision. The main innovation of EyeGenius is based on direct conversion of the fixation disparity value into a prism amount. Therefore, the trial prismatic lenses are not used during the test. The use of digital devices makes this method interactive and minimizes the influence of the examiner.


1968 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth N. Ogle ◽  
Theodore G. Martens ◽  
John A. Dyer

Strabismus ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 138-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
April Nilsson ◽  
Maria Nilsson ◽  
Scott B. Stevenson ◽  
Rune L. Brautaset

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saif Hassan Alrasheed

Purpose: To assess the clinical characteristics of patients presenting with headache at binocular vision clinic.Place and Duration of Study: Al-Neelain eye hospital, Sudan, from February to October 2018.Study Design: Cross-sectional study.Material and Methods: One hundred fifty patients with history of headache were included in study. Dissociated heterophoria was measured using Maddox Wing and Maddox Rod. Associated heterophoria was assessed by the Mallett unit fixation disparity and fusional vergence was measured using a prism bar. The relationship between measures was determined using the chi-squared analysis. For all statistical determinations, significance levels were set at p < 0.05.Results: Mean age was 25 ± 3.5 years. Femalesconstituted 78% and headache was significantly associated with females (P < 0.0001). Majority of patients (82%)presented with exophoria (mean = 4.74 ± 0.75 Δ Base-In) at near fixation, 10.7% were orthophoric and7.34percentage were esophoric (mean = 3.24 ± 0.5 Δ Base-Out). The association between near heterophoria andheadache was statically significant (χ2 = 7.426; p = 0.001). Association between distance heterophoria andheadache was not statistically significant (χ2 = 22.172; p = 0.265). The association between headache andpositive fusional vergence at near fixation was statically significant (p = 0.03). Leading cause of headache wasconvergence weakness exophoria (39.3%; p = 0.001), followed by convergence insufficiency (24%; p = 0.02).Conclusion: Headache was more common in females and was associated with exophoria, convergenceinsufficiency and inadequate positive fusional vergence at near fixation


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Volkhard Schroth ◽  
Roland Joos ◽  
Ewald Alshuth ◽  
Wolfgang Jaschinski

Fixation disparity (FD) refers to a suboptimal condition of binocular vision. The oculomotor aspect of FD refers to a misadjustment in the vergence angle between the two visual axes that is measured in research with eye trackers (objective fixation disparity, oFD). The sensory aspect is psychophysically tested using dichoptic nonius lines (subjective fixation disparity, sFD). Some optometrists use nonius tests to determine the prisms for constant wear aiming to align the eyes. However, they do not (yet) use eye trackers. We investigate the effect of aligning prisms on oFD and sFD for 60 sec exposure duration of prisms determined with the clinically established Cross test in far distance vision. Without prisms, both types of FD were correlated with the aligning prism, while with prisms the FD was close to zero (these analyses included all base-in and base-out cases). The effect of base-in prisms on oFD was proportional to the amount of the aligning prism for the present 60 sec exposure, similar as for the 2- 5 sec exposure in Schmid et al. (2018). Thus, within 1 minute of prism exposure, no substantial vergence adaptation seems to occur in the present test conditions. Further studies may investigate intra- individual responses to different exposure times of aligning prisms in both prism directions.


1913 ◽  
Vol 76 (1964supp) ◽  
pp. 122-123
Author(s):  
Frederic Campbell
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document