Comparison of Radial Forearm With Fibula and Scapula Osteocutaneous Free Flaps for Oromandibular Reconstruction

Extensive soft tissue defects following trauma, burn or after cancer surgery need coverage by flaps. Sometimes surrounding tissues are not healthy enough or quantity is not favorable to provide adequate pedicle flaps. Microvascular free flap can provide healthy tissue of adequate amount from distant area for those difficult situations.15 microvascular free flaps were performed from October 2011 to February 2013. Radial forearm free flap was done in 8 and Latissimusdorsi (LD) flap in 7 cases. 10 flaps done in foot, ankle & lower leg region (radial forearm-5, LD-5) and 5 flaps were done in face and scalp region (radial forearm-4, LD-1).12 flaps healed uneventfully with good coverage of the defect. Average ischemia time was 135 min (range 100-240 min) and average anastomosis time was 75 min (average 60-100 min). 2 flaps failed. There was necrosis of the tip of 2 LD and cumbersome swelling of the flap was found in 2 cases of LD flaps.Large soft tissue defect of body where local or regional flaps are not feasible; can be easily covered with free flaps. Its capacity to cover huge soft tissue defect has neutralizes its technical demand. Though complications are still high in our hands; can be reduced performing more number of cases. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bdjps.v3i2.18242 Bangladesh Journal of Plastic Surgery July 2012, 3(2): 33-37

Download Full-text

S154 – Primary TEP and Patch Free-Flap Laryngectomy Reconstruction

Otolaryngology ◽

10.1016/j.otohns.2008.05.328 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽

pp. P128-P128 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Tamer Abdel-Halim Ghanem ◽

Justin McLarty ◽

Farhad Ardeshirpour ◽

Christopher F Baranano ◽

Eben L Rosenthal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Free Flap ◽

Total Laryngectomy ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Free Flaps ◽

Fistula Formation ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Radial Forearm ◽

Speech Therapist ◽

Fistula Rate ◽

Tracheoesophageal Puncture

Objectives 1. Assess speech outcomes for patients undergoing primary tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) following total laryngectomy (TL) with patch free flap reconstruction. 2. Evaluate risk of fistulization following primary TEP vs. no TEP in patch free flap TL reconstruction. Methods Patients undergoing reconstruction with patch free-flaps following TL were studied retrospectively. Demographic data, surgical procedures, speech outcomes, and postoperative complications were collected. Patients were divided in 2 groups depending on whether TEP was performed at the time of ablation (primary TEP). Voice outcomes were assessed by a speech therapist. Results 77 patients underwent TL, mean age of 63 years. Glottis (60%), followed by hypopharynx (18%), and supraglottis (17%) were the most common tumor sites. Most patients had T3 and T4 disease (71%) on initial presentation, and there were 57% undergoing salvage total laryngectomy. The radial forearm fascioucutaneous free flap was used in 90% of the cases. Primary TEP was performed in 44 patients (57%), and only 1 of 33 patients underwent a TEP procedure secondarily. Voice outcomes for the TEP group were good. The overall fistula rate was 39%, half of which healed spontaneously. The fistula rate in the primary TEP group was 41%, and in the group not receiving primary TEP it was 36.7% (p=0.87). Conclusions Primary TEP performed at the time of free-flap patch reconstruction after TL enhances speech outcomes for patients, and does not lead to an increased risk in fistula formation.

Download Full-text

Sequela de cirurgia para reconstrução mandibular após ressecção de ameloblastoma

ARCHIVES OF HEALTH INVESTIGATION ◽

10.21270/archi.v8i8.4632 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (8) ◽

Author(s):

Allancardi dos Santos Siqueira ◽

Luiz Henrique Soares Torres ◽

Jiordanne Araújo Diniz ◽

Éwerton Daniel Rocha Rodrigues ◽

Caio Pimenteira Uchôa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Soft Tissue ◽

Free Flap ◽

Platelet Rich Plasma ◽

Treatment Algorithm ◽

Free Flaps ◽

Mandibular Reconstruction ◽

Benign Tumors ◽

New Classification ◽

Oromandibular Reconstruction ◽

Head Neck

Os defeitos mandibulares devido à ressecção de lesão óssea interferem a harmonia e estética facial comprometendo a qualidade de vida dos pacientes. Grandes defeitos exigem planejamento minucioso, principalmente quando lançamos mão de enxertos e placas de reconstrução, evitando assim resultados insatisfatórios ou até mesmo sequelas. Apesar de algumas classificações dos defeitos mandibulares vêm sendo discutidas ao longo dos anos, ainda não há um protocolo definido para reconstrução mandibular. O uso de prototipagem na Cirurgia Bucomaxilofacial tem se tornado cada vez mais frequente; a precisão da reconstrução, diminuição do tempo de cirurgia reflete em recuperação mais rápida do paciente. Mesmo com a ferramenta da prototipagem, grandes lesões e perdas ósseas permanecem como grande desafio ao cirurgião. O objetivo deste trabalho é relatar um caso clínico de reconstrução mandibular no qual houve a necessidade de ser tratado com remoção de placa de reconstrução e nova reabilitação cirúrgica do paciente.Descritores: Mandíbula; Reconstrução Mandibular; Modelos Biológicos.ReferênciasSantos LCS, Seixas AM, Barbosa B, Cincura RNS. Adaptação de placas reconstrutivas: uma nova técnica. Rev Cir Traumatol Buco-Maxilo-Fac. 2011;11(2):9-14.Lin PY, Lin KC, Jeng SF. Oromandibular reconstruction: the history, operative options and strategies, and our experience. ISRN Surg. 2011;2011:824251.Martins Jr. JC, Keim FS. Uso de prototipagem no planejamento de reconstrução microcirúrgica da mandíbula. Rev Bras Cir Craniomaxilofac. 2011;14(4):225-28.Montoro JR, Tavares MG, Melo DH, Franco Rde L, Mello-Filho FV, Xavier SP, Trivellato AE, Lucas AS. Mandibular ameloblastoma treated by bone resection and imediate reconstruction. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;74(1):155-57.Nóia CF, Ortega-Lopes R, Chaves Netto HDM, Nascimento FFAO, Sá BCM. Desafios na reconstrução mandibular devido a lesões extensas ou traumatismos. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 2015;69(2):158-63.Cohen A, Laviv A, Berman P, Nashef R, Abu-Tair J. Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(5):661-6.Rana M, Warraich R, Kokemüller H, Lemound J, Essig H, Tavassol F et al. Reconstruction of mandibular defects - clinical retrospective research over a 10-year period. Head Neck Oncol. 2011;3:23.Fariña R, Alister JP, Uribe F, Olate S, Arriagada A. Indications of Free Grafts in Mandibular Reconstruction, after Removing Benign Tumors: Treatment Algorithm. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(8):e845.Fariña R, Plaza C, Martinovic G. New transference technique of position of mandibular reconstructing plates using stereolithographic models. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;7(11):2544-48.Mooren RE, Merkx MA, Kessler PA, Jansen JA, Stoelinga PJ. Reconstruction of the mandible using preshaped 2.3-mm titanium plates, autogenous cortical bone plates, particulate cancellous bone, and platelet-rich plasma: a retrospective analysis of 20 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(10):2459–67.Brown JS, Barry C, Ho M, Shaw R.A new classification for mandibular defects after oncological resection. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(1):23-30Urken ML, Weinberg H, Vickery C, Buchbinder D, Lawson W, Biller HF. Oromandibular reconstruction using microvascular composite free flaps. Report of 71 cases and a new classification scheme for bony, soft-tissue, and neurologic defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117(7):733-44.Shnayder Y, Lin D, Desai SC, Nussenbaum B, Sand JP, Wax MK. Reconstruction of the Lateral Mandibular Defect: A Review and Treatment Algorithm. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17(5):367-73.Wei FC, Celik N, YangWG, Chen IH, Chang YM, Chen HC. Complications after reconstruction by plate and soft-tissue free flap in composite mandibular defects and secondary salvage reconstruction with osteocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(1):37-42.Li BH, Jung HJ, Choi SW, Kim SM, Kim MJ, Lee JH. Latissimus dorsi (LD) free flap and reconstruction plate used for extensive maxillo-mandibular reconstruction after tumour ablation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40(8):293-300.

Download Full-text

Is there an ideal way to close the donor site of radial forearm free flaps?

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ◽

10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.04.016 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 56 (6) ◽

pp. 444-452 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

A.M. Pabst ◽

R. Werkmeister ◽

J. Steegmann ◽

F. Hölzle ◽

A. Bartella

Keyword(s):

Donor Site ◽

Free Flaps ◽

Radial Forearm

Download Full-text

The Radial Forearm Flap

Operative Plastic Surgery ◽

10.1093/med/9780190499075.003.0038 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 375-382

Author(s):

Brogan G. A. Evans ◽

Gregory R. D. Evans

Keyword(s):

Patient Management ◽

Free Tissue Transfer ◽

Free Flaps ◽

Radial Forearm Flap ◽

Forearm Flap ◽

Preoperative Marking ◽

Great Utility ◽

Radial Forearm ◽

Good Cosmesis ◽

Tissue Defects

Radial forearm free-flaps (RFFF) offer great utility in the reconstruction of intraoral soft tissue defects. The use of a free tissue transfer with the radial forearm flap can obviate poor wound healing and replace previously irradiated tissue with well-perfused normal fascia and skin. Considerable care must be taken by the surgeon to preserve adequate function of speech and swallow, as well as to obtain good cosmesis. Knowledge of proper anatomical orientation and preoperative marking provide keys to a successful flap dissection and intraoral reconstruction. After reading this chapter, the reader should have an understanding of the assessment of intraoral defects, indications for RFFF, intraoperative techniques, and marking, as well as postoperative patient management.

Download Full-text