Primary Care Performance in Fee-for-Service and Prepaid Health Care Systems

JAMA ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 271 (20) ◽  
pp. 1579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana Gelb Safran
2021 ◽  
pp. 155982762110066
Author(s):  
Amy R. Mechley

Primary care has been shown to significantly decrease the overall cost of a population’s health care while improving the quality of each person’s well-being. Lifestyle medicine (LM) is ideally positioned to be delivered via primary care and has been shown to improve short- and long-term health outcomes of patients and populations. Direct primary care (DPC) represents a viable alternative to the fee-for-service reimbursement model. It has been shown to be economically and financially sustainable. Furthermore, it has the potential to fulfill the Quadruple Aim of health care in the United States. LM practiced in a DPC model has the potential to transform health care delivery. This article will discuss the need for health care systems change, provide an overview of the DPC model, demonstrate a basic understanding of the benefits, and review the steps needed to de-risk the investment of time, money, and resources for our future DPC providers.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 33-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Kates

For 20 years mental health and primary care providers across Canada have been working collaboratively together to improve access to care, provider skills, and patient experience. The new strategic plan of the Mental Health Commission of Canada (MHCC) offers many opportunities for collaborative care to play a role in the transformation of Canada’s mental health systems. To assist the plan, this paper presents principles underlying successful projects and ways that mental health and primary care services can work together more collaboratively, including integrating mental health providers in primary care. It integrates these concepts into a Canadian Model for Collaborative Mental Health Care that can guide future expansion of these approaches, and suggests ways in which better collaboration can address wider issues facing all of Canada’s health care systems.


2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 298-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Siegrist ◽  
Rebecca Shackelton ◽  
Carol Link ◽  
Lisa Marceau ◽  
Olaf von dem Knesebeck ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Smith L

The successes and limitations of primary mental health care systems in three countries outside of Ireland are examined in order to inform potential change for the Irish primary mental health care system. Systems currently at work within Scotland, England, and the Netherlands are outlined, all of which employ versions of the “stepped-care” approach to primary care. It is acknowledged that Ireland is attempting to modify primary care to include the stepped-care approach. However, there are significant limitations to the current Irish system. With the Scottish, English, and Dutch systems in mind, an alternative vision of primary mental health care for Ireland is suggested.


Author(s):  
Bruce J. Schwartz ◽  
Gillian Stein ◽  
Scott Wetzler

The idea that addressing behavioral health issues will generate sufficient cost savings in the general medical sector to reduce overall health care spending is a poignant argument for integrating primary care and behavioral health care programs. The enactment of recent health care legislation, particularly the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (2008) and the Affordable Care Act (2010), affords a unique opportunity to transform the way in which care is funded. This transformation is vital to the integrated care project. This chapter outlines the history of integrated care financing and the separation of mental and physical health care systems and discusses reimbursement strategies that have been suggested to replace fee-for-service models. The authors argue that the success of the medical cost offset hypothesis depends on targeting high-cost patients, as well as moving away from siloed reimbursement toward global budgeting.


1993 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-98
Author(s):  
Bodo B. Schlegelmilch ◽  
James M. Carman

This paper explores attitudes of university students towards two differently organised health services, ie the National Health Service in the UK and the more market oriented system in the US and analyses the level of confidence placed in primary care providers (GPs/family physicians) in both systems. Although major differences in the perception of the two health care systems are identified, hardly any differences emerge between the two countries in terms of the confidence patients place in their primary care providers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document