scholarly journals Medicare Spending on Drugs With Accelerated Approval, 2015-2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. e213937
Author(s):  
Benjamin N. Rome ◽  
William B. Feldman ◽  
Aaron S. Kesselheim
Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2968
Author(s):  
Anuhya Kommalapati ◽  
Sri Harsha Tella ◽  
Mitesh Borad ◽  
Milind Javle ◽  
Amit Mahipal

Fibroblast Growth Factor receptor (FGFR) pathway aberrations have been implicated in approximately 7% of the malignancies. As our knowledge of FGFR aberrations in cancer continues to evolve, FGFR inhibitors emerged as potential targeted therapeutic agents. The promising results of pemigatinib and infigratinib in advanced unresectable cholangiocarcinoma harboring FGFR2 fusions or rearrangement, and erdafitinib in metastatic urothelial carcinoma with FGFR2 and FGFR3 genetic aberrations, lead to their accelerated approval by the United States (USA) FDA. Along with these agents, many phase II/III clinical trials are currently evaluating the use of derazantinib, infigratinib, and futibatinib either alone or in combination with immunotherapy. Despite the encouraging results seen with FGFR inhibitors, resistance mechanisms and side effect profile may limit their clinical utility. A better understanding of the unique FGFR-inhibitor-related toxicities would invariably help us in the prevention and effective management of FGFR-inhibitor-induced adverse events thereby enhancing their clinical benefit. Herein, we summarized the physiology of FGF/FGFR signaling and briefly discussed the possible mechanisms that could lead to FGFR inhibitor resistance and side effects. In addition, we proposed treatment guidelines for the management of FGFR-inhibitor-associated toxicities. This work would invariably help practicing oncologists to effectively manage the unique toxicities of FGFR inhibitors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document