Exposure–response analyses of erdafitinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma

Background Exposure–response analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between selected efficacy and safety endpoints and serum phosphate (PO4) concentrations, a potential biomarker of efficacy and safety, in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients with FGFR alterations treated with erdafitinib. Methods Data from two dosing regimens of erdafitinib in a phase 2 study (NCT02365597), 6 and 8-mg/day with provision for pharmacodynamically guided titration per serum PO4 levels, were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard or logistic regression models. Efficacy endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Safety endpoints were adverse events typical for FGFR inhibitors. Results Exposure-efficacy analyses on 156 patients (6-mg = 68; 8-mg = 88) showed that patients with higher serum PO4 levels within the first 6 weeks showed better OS (hazard ratio 0.57 [95% CI 0.46–0.72] per mg/dL of PO4; p = 0.01), PFS (hazard ratio 0.80 [0.67–0.94] per mg/dL of PO4; p = 0.01), and ORR (odds ratio 1.38 [1.02–1.86] per mg/dL of PO4; p = 0.04). Exposure-safety analyses on 177 patients (6-mg = 78; 8-mg = 99) showed that the incidence of selected adverse events associated with on-target off-tumor effects significantly rose with higher PO4. Conclusions The exploratory relationship between serum PO4 levels and efficacy/safety outcomes supported the use of pharmacodynamically guided dose titration to optimize erdafitinib’s therapeutic benefit/risk ratio. Clinical trial registration number NCT02365597.

Impact of COVID-19 on patient and healthcare professional attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors toward the healthcare system and on the dynamics of the healthcare pathway

Background COVID-19 has dramatically changed how healthcare is delivered and experienced. Methods One-on-one interviews and a virtual ethnographic roundtable were conducted among 45 patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in 4 therapeutic areas from the United States and Japan: overactive bladder, vasomotor symptoms, prostate cancer, and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The goal was to identify the impact of COVID-19 on patient/caregiver and HCP attitudes, interactions, beliefs, and behaviors toward the healthcare system and care pathway. Results Four foundational themes were identified: 1) COVID-19 risk is relative; 2) isolation is collateral damage; 3) telehealth is a parallel universe; and 4) COVID-19 is destabilizing the foundations of healthcare. Numerous insights, influenced by diverse cultural, social, and psychological factors, were identified within each theme. Conclusions The impacts of COVID-19 were noticeable at multiple points of care during the “universal” care pathway, including at initial screening, referral to specialists, diagnosis, treatment initiation/surgery, and during ongoing care. Greater appreciation of the short- and long-term impacts of COVID-19 and resulting gaps in care may act as a catalyst for positive change in future patient care.

Hypoxic Characteristic Genes Predict Response to Immunotherapy for Urothelial Carcinoma

Objective: Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been a massive obstacle to ICI treatment in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (MUC). Recently, increasing evidence indicates the clinical importance of the association between hypoxia and immune status in tumor patients. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the relationship between hypoxia and prognosis in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.Methods: Transcriptomic and clinical data from 348 MUC patients who underwent ICI treatment from a large phase 2 trial (IMvigor210) were investigated in this study. The cohort was randomly divided into two datasets, a training set (n = 213) and a testing set (n = 135). Data of hypoxia-related genes were downloaded from the molecular signatures database (MSigDB), and screened by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis to construct a prognosis-predictive model. The robustness of the model was evaluated in two melanoma cohorts. Furthermore, an external validation cohort, the bladder cancer cohort, from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, was t used to explore the mechanism of gene mutation, immune cell infiltration, signaling pathway enrichment, and drug sensitivity.Results: We categorized patients as the high- or low- risk group using a four-gene hypoxia risk model which we constructed. It was found that patients with high-risk scores had significantly worse overall survival (OS) compared with those with low-risk scores. The prognostic model covers 0.71 of the area under the ROC curve in the training set and 0.59 in the testing set, which is better than the survival prediction of MUC patients using the clinical characteristics. Mutation analysis results showed that deletion mutations in RB1, TP53, TSC1 and KDM6A were correlated with hypoxic status. Immune cell infiltration analysis illustrated that the infiltration T cells, B cells, Treg cells, and macrophages was correlated with hypoxia. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that a hypoxic microenvironment activated inflammatory pathways, glucose metabolism pathways, and immune-related pathways.Conclusion: In this investigation, a four-gene hypoxia risk model was developed to evaluate the degree of hypoxia and prognosis of ICI treatment, which showed a promising clinical prediction value in MUC. Furthermore, the hypoxia risk model revealed a close relationship between hypoxia and the tumor immune microenvironment.

Cabozantinib plus immunotherapy combinations in metastatic renal cell and urothelial carcinoma

Treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) have increased dramatically over the past decade. However, even when novel approaches have proven to be effective as monotherapy, many patients still develop progressive disease, and different strategies are needed to increase clinical response and quality of life. Strategies combining targeted therapy (TT) and immunotherapy (IO) have emerged as a way to shorten the gap between responders and nonresponders to monotherapy and have reported promising results. In this review, we discuss the current role of cabozantinib in combination with IO agents in the treatment of metastatic RCC and UC and go over future directions in the field.