scholarly journals State Regulations Governing Firearms in Early Care and Education Settings in the US

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. e203321
Author(s):  
Sara E. Benjamin-Neelon ◽  
Elyse R. Grossman
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-241
Author(s):  
Mark Nagasawa

This is a case study of political struggles over early care and education in the USA using a combination of archival, interview, and observational data from a study conducted in the US state of Arizona. This case analysis illustrates how a combination of the episodic nature of public attention paid to early care and education in the USA, internal tensions within US early care and education between its educational and caring purposes, and competition over scarce resources has worked to undermine the development of universal early care and education in the USA. The study is framed by Dorothy Holland and Jean Lave’s ideas of enduring struggles and locally contested practice, and uses an analytic strategy informed by Bakhtinian theory to illustrate how understanding the cultural logics involved in locally contested practice can be of use to the practice of policy advocacy, specifically engaging adversaries with what Bakhtin called an “excess of seeing” - understanding beneath the surface. While focused on one state in one national context, this analysis may have transnational relevance by raising comparative questions about early care and education policies and policy practice in other localities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elyse R. Grossman ◽  
Eileen M. McDonald ◽  
Andrea C. Gielen ◽  
Sara E. Benjamin-Neelon

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ayers Looby ◽  
Natasha Frost ◽  
Sarah Gonzalez-Nahm ◽  
Elyse R. Grossman ◽  
Julie Ralston Aoki ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective In July 2018 the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics released a benchmark encouraging early care and education (ECE) programs, including child care centers and family child care homes, to incorporate cultural and religious food preferences of children into meals. We examined the extent to which states were already doing so through their ECE licensing and administrative regulations prior to the release of the benchmark. This review may serve as a baseline to assess future updates, if more states incorporate the benchmark into their regulations. Methods For this cross-sectional study, we reviewed ECE regulations for all 50 states and the District of Columbia (hereafter states) through June 2018. We assessed consistency with the benchmark for centers and homes. We conducted Spearman correlations to estimate associations between the year the regulations were updated and consistency with the benchmark. Results Among centers, eight states fully met the benchmark, 11 partially met the benchmark, and 32 did not meet the benchmark. Similarly for homes, four states fully met the benchmark, 13 partially met the benchmark, and 34 did not meet the benchmark. Meeting the benchmark was not correlated with the year of last update for centers (P = 0.54) or homes (P = 0.31). Conclusions Most states lacked regulations consistent with the benchmark. Health professionals can help encourage ECE programs to consider cultural and religious food preferences of children in meal planning. And, if feasible, states may consider additional regulations supporting cultural and religious preferences of children in future updates to regulations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 368-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara E. Benjamin-Neelon ◽  
Brian Neelon ◽  
John Pearce ◽  
Elyse R. Grossman ◽  
Sarah Gonzalez-Nahm ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeannine Love ◽  
Erica Williams ◽  
Anne W. Mitchell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document