Information Processing Biases

Author(s):  
Peter Muris ◽  
Andy Field
2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-94
Author(s):  
Hwee Cheng Tan ◽  
Ken T. Trotman

ABSTRACT We investigate the effect of regulatory requirements on impairment decisions and managers' search for and evaluation of impairment information. We manipulate reversibility of impairment losses (“can be reversed” versus “cannot be reversed”) and transparency in disclosures of impairment assumptions (more transparent versus less transparent) in a 2 × 2 experiment. We find that managers are more willing to impair when impairment losses can be reversed than when they cannot be reversed, but this effect does not vary with disclosure transparency. We also find that managers display information search bias in all four experimental conditions, however, regulatory requirements do not result in differences in the level of information search bias across the conditions. In contrast, regulatory requirements affect the differences in the level of information evaluation bias across conditions. We find that when impairment losses cannot be reversed, information evaluation bias is higher when disclosures are more transparent than less transparent. JEL Classification: M40; M41.


2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Steinberg ◽  
Brandon E. Gibb ◽  
Lauren B. Alloy ◽  
Lyn Y. Abramson

Previous work has established a relationship between reports of childhood emotional maltreatment and cognitive vulnerability to depression, as well as an association between cognitive vulnerability and self-referent information-processing biases. Findings from this study of individuals at low (LR) and high (HR) cognitive risk for depression revealed a relationship between reports of childhood emotional maltreatment and current information processing biases. Specifically, individuals with greater childhood emotional maltreatment exhibited more negative self-referent information processing. Moreover, cognitive risk mediated the relationship between childhood emotional maltreatment and these information-processing biases. Testing an alternate model, information-processing biases also mediated the relationship between childhood emotional maltreatment and cognitive risk.


Author(s):  
Andrew Mathews

Chapter 3 discusses information-processing biases in emotional disorders, including the nature of information-processing in cognition and emotion, biases in information-processing (perceptual encoding, interpretation of meaning, implicit and explicit memory), automatic and controlled processing, content specificity, differences among disorders, the distinction between normal and abnormal mood, and links between research and treatment.


2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Armstrong ◽  
Melissa Divack ◽  
Bieke David ◽  
Casey Simmons ◽  
Stephen D. Benning ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document